Menu

Yale University Investments Office Case Study Help

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Harvard >> Yale University Investments Office >>

Yale University Investments Office Case Study Solution

Yale University Investments Office is currently one of the greatest food chains worldwide. It was founded by Harvard in 1866, a German Pharmacist who first released "FarineLactee"; a combination of flour and milk to feed infants and reduce mortality rate. At the very same time, the Page siblings from Switzerland also found The Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company. The two ended up being rivals in the beginning but later on combined in 1905, leading to the birth of Yale University Investments Office.
Business is now a global company. Unlike other multinational business, it has senior executives from various nations and attempts to make choices considering the whole world. Yale University Investments Office currently has more than 500 factories around the world and a network spread throughout 86 nations.

Purpose

The purpose of Yale University Investments Office Corporation is to boost the lifestyle of people by playing its part and supplying healthy food. It wants to help the world in shaping a healthy and much better future for it. It likewise wishes to encourage individuals to live a healthy life. While making sure that the company is prospering in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a much better and healthy future

Vision

Yale University Investments Office's vision is to offer its clients with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to eat. It wants to be ingenious and concurrently comprehend the requirements and requirements of its consumers. Its vision is to grow fast and offer products that would satisfy the requirements of each age group. Yale University Investments Office pictures to develop a well-trained labor force which would help the business to grow
.

Mission

Yale University Investments Office's objective is that as presently, it is the leading business in the food market, it believes in 'Good Food, Good Life". Its objective is to offer its customers with a variety of choices that are healthy and best in taste. It is concentrated on supplying the best food to its clients throughout the day and night.

Products.

Yale University Investments Office has a wide variety of products that it offers to its customers. In 2011, Business was listed as the most rewarding organization.

Goals and Objectives

• Keeping in mind the vision and mission of the corporation, the company has actually laid down its objectives and goals. These objectives and goals are listed below.
• One goal of the company is to reach no landfill status. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another objective of Yale University Investments Office is to lose minimum food throughout production. Frequently, the food produced is squandered even before it reaches the customers.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to enhance its packaging in such a method that it would help it to decrease the above-mentioned complications and would also ensure the shipment of high quality of its products to its clients.
• Meet international requirements of the environment.
• Build a relationship based upon trust with its consumers, service partners, employees, and government.

Critical Issues

Just Recently, Business Company is focusing more towards the technique of NHW and investing more of its profits on the R&D technology. The country is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW strategy. However, the target of the company is not accomplished as the sales were anticipated to grow higher at the rate of 10% annually and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given in Exhibition H. There is a requirement to focus more on the sales then the innovation technology. Otherwise, it might result in the decreased earnings rate. (Henderson, 2012).

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The existing Business technique is based upon the principle of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This strategy deals with the idea to bringing modification in the client choices about food and making the food things much healthier concerning about the health problems.
The vision of this technique is based upon the secret method i.e. 60/40+ which merely suggests that the products will have a rating of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based on its nutritional worth. The products will be produced with extra dietary value in contrast to all other products in market acquiring it a plus on its dietary content.
This strategy was embraced to bring more yummy plus healthy foods and beverages in market than ever. In competition with other business, with an intent of maintaining its trust over customers as Business Business has actually gained more relied on by clients.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Spending as a portion of sales are decreasing with increasing real quantity of costs shows that the sales are increasing at a greater rate than its R&D spending, and allow the business to more invest in R&D.
Net Earnings Margin is increasing while R&D as a percentage of sales is declining. This indicator likewise reveals a green light to the R&D costs, mergers and acquisitions.
Debt ratio of the business is increasing due to its costs on mergers, acquisitions and R&D advancement rather than payment of financial obligations. This increasing debt ratio pose a threat of default of Business to its financiers and might lead a decreasing share prices. In terms of increasing financial obligation ratio, the firm must not spend much on R&D and needs to pay its present debts to decrease the threat for investors.
The increasing threat of financiers with increasing debt ratio and declining share costs can be observed by big decrease of EPS of Yale University Investments Office stocks.
The sales development of business is likewise low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception structure of customers. This slow development also prevent company to more spend on its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Keep in mind: All the above analysis is done on the basis of computations and Charts given up the Displays D and E.

TWOS Analysis


TWOS analysis can be used to obtain different strategies based on the SWOT Analysis offered above. A short summary of TWOS Analysis is given in Exhibition H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business must introduce more innovative products by big quantity of R&D Costs and mergers and acquisitions. It might increase the marketplace share of Business and increase the profit margins for the business. It could also provide Business a long term competitive advantage over its competitors.
The worldwide growth of Business must be focused on market catching of establishing nations by expansion, drawing in more consumers through client's commitment. As developing countries are more populous than developed countries, it could increase the client circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisYale University Investments Office ought to do careful acquisition and merger of companies, as it might impact the customer's and society's perceptions about Business. It should get and combine with those business which have a market reputation of healthy and healthy companies. It would improve the understandings of consumers about Business.
Business ought to not just spend its R&D on innovation, rather than it should likewise focus on the R&D spending over examination of expense of various healthy products. This would increase cost performance of its products, which will result in increasing its sales, due to decreasing prices, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business needs to move to not only establishing however likewise to developed countries. It should broadens its geographical expansion. This large geographical expansion towards establishing and established countries would reduce the danger of potential losses in times of instability in different countries. It should broaden its circle to numerous countries like Unilever which runs in about 170 plus countries.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

It needs to get and combine with those nations having a goodwill of being a healthy company in the market. It would also enable the business to use its possible resources effectively on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those organizations slowing the NHW technique growth.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The market division of Business is based upon four aspects; age, gender, income and occupation. For example, Business produces a number of items connected to infants i.e. Cerelac, Nido, etc. and associated to adults i.e. confectionary items. Yale University Investments Office products are quite economical by almost all levels, but its major targeted customers, in regards to earnings level are middle and upper middle level clients.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical segmentation of Business is made up of its existence in nearly 86 nations. Its geographical division is based upon two main factors i.e. typical earnings level of the consumer along with the environment of the area. Singapore Business Company's division is done on the basis of the weather condition of the region i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic division of Business is based upon the character and life style of the consumer. For example, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those customers whose life style is rather hectic and don't have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Yale University Investments Office behavioral segmentation is based upon the mindset understanding and awareness of the client. For instance its highly nutritious items target those customers who have a health conscious attitude towards their consumptions.

Yale University Investments Office Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand name in the market and keep the customer undamaged with the brand name, there are two choices:
Option: 1
The Business must invest more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase overall possessions of the business, increasing the wealth of the business. However, spending on R&D would be sunk expense.
2. The company can resell the acquired units in the market, if it stops working to execute its technique. Quantity invest on the R&D might not be revived, and it will be thought about totally sunk cost, if it do not offer prospective outcomes.
3. Spending on R&D offer sluggish growth in sales, as it takes long period of time to present an item. Nevertheless, acquisitions provide quick outcomes, as it offer the business currently established product, which can be marketed soon after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of business's which do not fit with the business's worths like Kraftz foods can lead the company to face misconception of customers about Business core worths of healthy and healthy items.
2 Large costs on acquisitions than R&D would send out a signal of company's inefficiency of developing innovative items, and would lead to customer's discontentment as well.
3. Large acquisitions than R&D would extend the line of product of the company by the items which are already present in the market, making company not able to introduce brand-new innovative items.
Option: 2.
The Business should invest more on its R&D instead of acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would allow the company to produce more ingenious items.
2. It would provide the company a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would allow the business to increase its targeted customers by introducing those items which can be provided to a totally new market section.
4. Innovative products will offer long term advantages and high market share in long term.
Cons:
1. It would reduce the earnings margins of the company.
2. In case of failure, the entire costs on R&D would be considered as sunk cost, and would affect the business at big. The risk is not in the case of acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of company, which could offer a negative signal to the investors, and could result I declining stock costs.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with considerable spending on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would enable the company to present new ingenious products with less threat of converting the spending on R&D into sunk cost.
2. It would supply a positive signal to the investors, as the general properties of the company would increase with its substantial R&D spending.
3. It would not impact the profit margins of the business at a large rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would supply the company a strong long term market position in regards to the business's general wealth as well as in terms of ingenious products.
Cons:
1. Risk of conversion of R&D costs into sunk cost, higher than alternative 1 lower than alternative 2.
2. Threat of mistaken belief about the acquisitions, greater than alternative 2 and lower than option 1.
3. Introduction of less number of innovative products than alternative 2 and high variety of ingenious products than alternative 1.

Yale University Investments Office Conclusion

RecommendationsBusiness has actually remained the top market gamer for more than a years. It has actually institutionalized its methods and culture to align itself with the marketplace modifications and consumer habits, which has eventually permitted it to sustain its market share. Though, Business has actually developed significant market share and brand identity in the metropolitan markets, it is recommended that the business should focus on the backwoods in regards to developing brand name loyalty, awareness, and equity, such can be done by producing a specific brand name allocation method through trade marketing methods, that draw clear distinction in between Yale University Investments Office items and other competitor products. Moreover, Business needs to leverage its brand image of safe and healthy food in catering the rural markets and also to upscale the offerings in other classifications such as nutrition. This will permit the business to establish brand name equity for recently introduced and currently produced products on a greater platform, making the effective usage of resources and brand name image in the market.

Yale University Investments Office Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental support

Altering criteria of international food.
Enhanced market share. Altering assumption in the direction of healthier products Improvements in R&D and also QA departments.

Intro of E-marketing.
No such impact as it is good. Concerns over recycling.

Use of resources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Highest possible considering that 7000 Highest after Company with much less development than Business 8th Least expensive
R&D Spending Highest possible since 2004 Highest possible after Service 6th Least expensive
Net Profit Margin Highest considering that 2001 with fast development from 2001 to 2017 Because of sale of Alcon in 2016. Virtually equal to Kraft Foods Consolidation Nearly equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nutrition and also wellness element Highest number of brands with sustainable methods Biggest confectionary and refined foods brand name on the planet Biggest dairy products and also bottled water brand name worldwide
Segmentation Middle and also top middle degree customers worldwide Specific consumers along with household group Every age and Income Consumer Teams Middle and also upper center degree consumers worldwide
Number of Brands 7th 9th 8th 4th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 58742 828449 689467 397813 624977
Net Profit Margin 2.26% 8.34% 12.22% 5.79% 98.65%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 29.58 7.68 1.34 9.53 71.41
Total Asset 761282 714717 984583 974522 98366
Total Debt 39169 77559 61854 61611 74454
Debt Ratio 36% 87% 77% 26% 45%
R&D Spending 2516 2876 9556 7533 7842
R&D Spending as % of Sales 2.52% 1.46% 8.88% 3.12% 9.89%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations