Menu

University Of Trent Case Study Solution

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Harvard >> University Of Trent >>

University Of Trent Case Study Analysis

University Of Trent is presently among the biggest food chains worldwide. It was founded by Harvard in 1866, a German Pharmacist who first introduced "FarineLactee"; a mix of flour and milk to feed babies and reduce death rate. At the very same time, the Page brothers from Switzerland also found The Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company. The 2 ended up being rivals at first however later combined in 1905, resulting in the birth of University Of Trent.
Business is now a global company. Unlike other international companies, it has senior executives from various nations and attempts to make choices thinking about the entire world. University Of Trent presently has more than 500 factories worldwide and a network spread throughout 86 nations.

Purpose

The function of University Of Trent Corporation is to improve the lifestyle of people by playing its part and supplying healthy food. It wishes to help the world in forming a healthy and much better future for it. It also wishes to motivate people to live a healthy life. While making sure that the business is being successful in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a better and healthy future

Vision

University Of Trent's vision is to supply its consumers with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to eat. Business visualizes to establish a well-trained labor force which would help the business to grow
.

Mission

University Of Trent's objective is that as currently, it is the leading business in the food market, it believes in 'Excellent Food, Good Life". Its objective is to supply its customers with a variety of options that are healthy and best in taste also. It is focused on providing the very best food to its customers throughout the day and night.

Products.

Business has a vast array of products that it provides to its clients. Its products consist of food for babies, cereals, dairy products, treats, chocolates, food for animal and mineral water. It has around 4 hundred and fifty (450) factories around the globe and around 328,000 workers. In 2011, Business was noted as the most gainful organization.

Goals and Objectives

• Bearing in mind the vision and objective of the corporation, the company has set its goals and goals. These objectives and goals are noted below.
• One objective of the business is to reach zero land fill status. It is working toward absolutely no waste, where no waste of the factory is landfilled. It encourages its staff members to take the most out of the by-products. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another objective of University Of Trent is to lose minimum food throughout production. Most often, the food produced is squandered even prior to it reaches the clients.
• Another thing that Business is working on is to enhance its product packaging in such a method that it would help it to decrease those problems and would also ensure the shipment of high quality of its products to its customers.
• Meet worldwide standards of the environment.
• Build a relationship based upon trust with its customers, business partners, employees, and federal government.

Critical Issues

Just Recently, Business Company is focusing more towards the method of NHW and investing more of its revenues on the R&D technology. The nation is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW technique. The target of the company is not achieved as the sales were anticipated to grow higher at the rate of 10% per year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given in Exhibit H.

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The present Business technique is based upon the concept of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This method handles the concept to bringing change in the customer preferences about food and making the food things healthier concerning about the health concerns.
The vision of this technique is based on the secret approach i.e. 60/40+ which merely means that the products will have a score of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based on its nutritional worth. The products will be made with extra dietary value in contrast to all other items in market gaining it a plus on its dietary material.
This method was adopted to bring more tasty plus nutritious foods and beverages in market than ever. In competitors with other business, with an intention of maintaining its trust over customers as Business Business has gained more relied on by costumers.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Spending as a portion of sales are decreasing with increasing real quantity of costs shows that the sales are increasing at a higher rate than its R&D spending, and permit the business to more spend on R&D.
Net Earnings Margin is increasing while R&D as a portion of sales is decreasing. This indicator likewise reveals a green light to the R&D costs, mergers and acquisitions.
Financial obligation ratio of the business is increasing due to its costs on mergers, acquisitions and R&D development rather than payment of financial obligations. This increasing financial obligation ratio pose a hazard of default of Business to its investors and might lead a declining share costs. In terms of increasing financial obligation ratio, the firm needs to not spend much on R&D and ought to pay its current financial obligations to decrease the risk for investors.
The increasing danger of financiers with increasing financial obligation ratio and declining share rates can be observed by substantial decline of EPS of University Of Trent stocks.
The sales development of company is also low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception building of customers. This sluggish development likewise hinder business to additional spend on its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Note: All the above analysis is done on the basis of estimations and Charts given up the Displays D and E.

TWOS Analysis


2 analysis can be utilized to obtain different strategies based on the SWOT Analysis given above. A brief summary of TWOS Analysis is given up Exhibition H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business needs to introduce more ingenious items by big quantity of R&D Costs and mergers and acquisitions. It might increase the marketplace share of Business and increase the earnings margins for the business. It might likewise supply Business a long term competitive benefit over its competitors.
The global expansion of Business need to be concentrated on market catching of developing countries by growth, bring in more consumers through consumer's commitment. As developing nations are more populated than industrialized countries, it might increase the consumer circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisUniversity Of Trent must do careful acquisition and merger of organizations, as it could impact the client's and society's understandings about Business. It should obtain and merge with those companies which have a market reputation of healthy and healthy companies. It would enhance the understandings of consumers about Business.
Business ought to not only spend its R&D on innovation, rather than it ought to likewise focus on the R&D spending over assessment of expense of different healthy items. This would increase expense effectiveness of its products, which will lead to increasing its sales, due to decreasing prices, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business needs to move to not only developing but likewise to developed countries. It ought to widen its circle to various countries like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus nations.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

It should acquire and combine with those countries having a goodwill of being a healthy business in the market. It would likewise make it possible for the company to use its prospective resources effectively on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those companies slowing the NHW method growth.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The market segmentation of Business is based on four factors; age, gender, earnings and profession. Business produces several products related to children i.e. Cerelac, Nido, and so on and related to adults i.e. confectionary products. University Of Trent products are quite cost effective by practically all levels, however its significant targeted consumers, in terms of income level are middle and upper middle level clients.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical division of Business is made up of its presence in practically 86 nations. Its geographical segmentation is based upon 2 primary factors i.e. average earnings level of the customer in addition to the climate of the region. Singapore Business Business's division is done on the basis of the weather of the region i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic segmentation of Business is based upon the personality and life style of the customer. For instance, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those customers whose life style is rather busy and do not have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

University Of Trent behavioral division is based upon the mindset knowledge and awareness of the customer. Its highly healthy products target those customers who have a health conscious attitude towards their consumptions.

University Of Trent Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand in the market and keep the client intact with the brand name, there are two options:
Alternative: 1
The Business needs to spend more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase total possessions of the business, increasing the wealth of the business. Nevertheless, spending on R&D would be sunk expense.
2. The company can resell the obtained units in the market, if it fails to implement its technique. However, quantity invest in the R&D might not be revived, and it will be considered totally sunk expense, if it do not provide potential outcomes.
3. Investing in R&D provide sluggish development in sales, as it takes long time to introduce a product. Nevertheless, acquisitions supply quick results, as it offer the company currently established item, which can be marketed soon after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of company's which do not fit with the company's values like Kraftz foods can lead the company to face mistaken belief of consumers about Business core worths of healthy and nutritious items.
2 Big spending on acquisitions than R&D would send a signal of company's ineffectiveness of developing ingenious products, and would lead to customer's frustration as well.
3. Big acquisitions than R&D would extend the product line of the business by the items which are currently present in the market, making company not able to present new ingenious products.
Option: 2.
The Business needs to spend more on its R&D instead of acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would allow the company to produce more ingenious items.
2. It would provide the company a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would allow the business to increase its targeted clients by presenting those items which can be offered to a completely brand-new market segment.
4. Innovative items will provide long term advantages and high market share in long run.
Cons:
1. It would decrease the profit margins of the company.
2. In case of failure, the entire costs on R&D would be thought about as sunk expense, and would impact the company at big. The risk is not in the case of acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of business, which could offer a negative signal to the financiers, and could result I declining stock prices.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with considerable spending on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would permit the company to present new innovative items with less danger of transforming the costs on R&D into sunk cost.
2. It would offer a favorable signal to the investors, as the total assets of the company would increase with its significant R&D spending.
3. It would not impact the profit margins of the business at a big rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would supply the company a strong long term market position in terms of the company's general wealth along with in terms of ingenious products.
Cons:
1. Danger of conversion of R&D spending into sunk expense, greater than option 1 lower than alternative 2.
2. Risk of mistaken belief about the acquisitions, higher than alternative 2 and lower than alternative 1.
3. Intro of less variety of ingenious items than alternative 2 and high number of innovative products than alternative 1.

University Of Trent Conclusion

RecommendationsIt has institutionalised its methods and culture to align itself with the market modifications and client habits, which has actually ultimately permitted it to sustain its market share. Business has developed considerable market share and brand identity in the metropolitan markets, it is advised that the company should focus on the rural locations in terms of developing brand commitment, awareness, and equity, such can be done by developing a particular brand name allowance strategy through trade marketing techniques, that draw clear difference between University Of Trent items and other rival items.

University Of Trent Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental support

Altering standards of global food.
Boosted market share. Transforming assumption in the direction of much healthier items Improvements in R&D and also QA divisions.

Introduction of E-marketing.
No such impact as it is good. Concerns over recycling.

Use of sources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Greatest because 8000 Highest after Company with much less development than Organisation 9th Most affordable
R&D Spending Greatest since 2004 Highest after Company 2nd Least expensive
Net Profit Margin Greatest because 2008 with rapid development from 2001 to 2013 Because of sale of Alcon in 2014. Practically equal to Kraft Foods Consolidation Virtually equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nourishment and also wellness element Highest possible variety of brands with lasting practices Biggest confectionary and also processed foods brand name in the world Biggest milk items and mineral water brand name in the world
Segmentation Middle and top center level consumers worldwide Specific consumers in addition to home group Every age and Income Client Teams Middle as well as top middle degree customers worldwide
Number of Brands 3rd 6th 9th 4th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 42833 141671 898367 575843 586331
Net Profit Margin 1.55% 6.51% 17.25% 9.47% 82.52%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 41.91 8.72 8.34 8.88 83.96
Total Asset 296528 599528 785653 172534 68463
Total Debt 19235 54431 95933 33734 38367
Debt Ratio 57% 63% 81% 89% 38%
R&D Spending 1941 6636 3538 2987 5652
R&D Spending as % of Sales 4.77% 7.28% 7.44% 3.17% 8.27%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations