Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up Case Study Help

Case Study Solution And Analysis

Home >> Harvard >> Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up >>

Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up Case Study Help

Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up is presently one of the biggest food cycle worldwide. It was established by Harvard in 1866, a German Pharmacist who first introduced "FarineLactee"; a mix of flour and milk to feed infants and decrease death rate. At the same time, the Page bros from Switzerland also discovered The Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company. The two ended up being rivals at first however later combined in 1905, leading to the birth of Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up.
Business is now a multinational company. Unlike other international business, it has senior executives from different countries and tries to make decisions thinking about the entire world. Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up presently has more than 500 factories around the world and a network spread throughout 86 countries.


The purpose of Business Corporation is to improve the quality of life of people by playing its part and supplying healthy food. While making sure that the company is succeeding in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a better and healthy future


Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up's vision is to provide its customers with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to consume. Business envisions to develop a trained labor force which would help the company to grow


Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up's objective is that as presently, it is the leading company in the food market, it thinks in 'Good Food, Great Life". Its objective is to provide its consumers with a variety of choices that are healthy and finest in taste. It is concentrated on supplying the very best food to its customers throughout the day and night.


Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up has a large range of products that it provides to its clients. In 2011, Business was noted as the most gainful organization.

Goals and Objectives

• Remembering the vision and objective of the corporation, the business has put down its objectives and objectives. These goals and goals are noted below.
• One objective of the company is to reach zero landfill status. It is working toward absolutely no waste, where no waste of the factory is landfilled. It encourages its employees to take the most out of the spin-offs. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another objective of Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up is to lose minimum food during production. Most often, the food produced is wasted even before it reaches the customers.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to improve its packaging in such a way that it would help it to minimize the above-mentioned complications and would likewise guarantee the shipment of high quality of its products to its customers.
• Meet global standards of the environment.
• Construct a relationship based upon trust with its customers, organisation partners, workers, and government.

Critical Issues

Just Recently, Business Business is focusing more towards the method of NHW and investing more of its profits on the R&D innovation. The country is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW technique. Nevertheless, the target of the business is not achieved as the sales were expected to grow higher at the rate of 10% each year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given in Exhibit H. There is a need to focus more on the sales then the development technology. Otherwise, it might lead to the decreased revenue rate. (Henderson, 2012).

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The present Business strategy is based upon the idea of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This strategy deals with the concept to bringing modification in the client choices about food and making the food things healthier worrying about the health issues.
The vision of this technique is based upon the key technique i.e. 60/40+ which simply indicates that the items will have a rating of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based on its dietary worth. The items will be produced with extra nutritional value in contrast to all other products in market acquiring it a plus on its nutritional material.
This technique was embraced to bring more yummy plus nutritious foods and drinks in market than ever. In competitors with other business, with an objective of retaining its trust over clients as Business Company has actually acquired more relied on by clients.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Spending as a percentage of sales are declining with increasing actual amount of spending shows that the sales are increasing at a greater rate than its R&D costs, and enable the business to more invest in R&D.
Net Profit Margin is increasing while R&D as a portion of sales is declining. This sign also reveals a green light to the R&D costs, mergers and acquisitions.
Financial obligation ratio of the business is increasing due to its costs on mergers, acquisitions and R&D advancement instead of payment of debts. This increasing debt ratio position a threat of default of Business to its investors and could lead a declining share costs. Therefore, in regards to increasing financial obligation ratio, the company needs to not invest much on R&D and ought to pay its present financial obligations to decrease the threat for investors.
The increasing risk of financiers with increasing debt ratio and decreasing share prices can be observed by big decrease of EPS of Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up stocks.
The sales growth of company is likewise low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow understanding building of customers. This slow development likewise prevent business to additional spend on its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Keep in mind: All the above analysis is done on the basis of calculations and Charts given in the Exhibitions D and E.

TWOS Analysis

TWOS analysis can be used to derive different strategies based upon the SWOT Analysis provided above. A brief summary of TWOS Analysis is given in Exhibit H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business should present more ingenious products by large quantity of R&D Spending and mergers and acquisitions. It could increase the marketplace share of Business and increase the profit margins for the business. It might also supply Business a long term competitive benefit over its rivals.
The global expansion of Business should be focused on market catching of establishing countries by expansion, drawing in more clients through customer's loyalty. As developing nations are more populated than industrialized countries, it might increase the client circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisCambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up ought to do careful acquisition and merger of companies, as it might affect the customer's and society's understandings about Business. It should get and combine with those business which have a market reputation of healthy and nutritious business. It would enhance the perceptions of customers about Business.
Business must not just spend its R&D on innovation, instead of it should likewise concentrate on the R&D costs over assessment of cost of numerous healthy products. This would increase expense effectiveness of its items, which will lead to increasing its sales, due to decreasing costs, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business needs to move to not only developing but also to industrialized countries. It must broadens its geographical expansion. This large geographical expansion towards developing and developed countries would decrease the risk of prospective losses in times of instability in different countries. It should widen its circle to different nations like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus nations.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

It needs to get and combine with those nations having a goodwill of being a healthy business in the market. It would also enable the business to utilize its possible resources efficiently on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those companies slowing the NHW method development.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The group segmentation of Business is based upon four aspects; age, gender, earnings and profession. Business produces a number of items related to children i.e. Cerelac, Nido, and so on and associated to adults i.e. confectionary products. Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up products are rather inexpensive by practically all levels, but its major targeted clients, in terms of income level are middle and upper middle level consumers.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical division of Business is composed of its existence in practically 86 nations. Its geographical division is based upon 2 primary factors i.e. average income level of the consumer along with the climate of the region. Singapore Business Company's division is done on the basis of the weather of the area i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic division of Business is based upon the personality and lifestyle of the customer. Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those consumers whose life style is quite hectic and don't have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up behavioral division is based upon the attitude understanding and awareness of the client. For instance its highly healthy items target those customers who have a health conscious mindset towards their consumptions.

Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand name in the market and keep the customer intact with the brand, there are two options:
Option: 1
The Company needs to invest more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
1. Acquisitions would increase total possessions of the company, increasing the wealth of the business. Nevertheless, costs on R&D would be sunk cost.
2. The company can resell the gotten systems in the market, if it fails to implement its strategy. Quantity invest on the R&D could not be revived, and it will be thought about totally sunk cost, if it do not give possible outcomes.
3. Investing in R&D offer sluggish growth in sales, as it takes long time to present an item. Acquisitions offer fast outcomes, as it offer the company already developed item, which can be marketed quickly after the acquisition.
1. Acquisition of company's which do not fit with the company's worths like Kraftz foods can lead the business to face mistaken belief of customers about Business core worths of healthy and nutritious items.
2 Large spending on acquisitions than R&D would send out a signal of company's inadequacy of developing innovative products, and would outcomes in customer's discontentment.
3. Big acquisitions than R&D would extend the product line of the business by the products which are already present in the market, making company not able to introduce brand-new ingenious items.
Alternative: 2.
The Company needs to spend more on its R&D instead of acquisitions.
1. It would enable the company to produce more ingenious items.
2. It would provide the company a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would allow the business to increase its targeted customers by presenting those products which can be used to a totally new market segment.
4. Innovative items will offer long term benefits and high market share in long run.
1. It would decrease the profit margins of the business.
2. In case of failure, the whole costs on R&D would be thought about as sunk cost, and would impact the company at large. The risk is not in the case of acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of company, which could provide an unfavorable signal to the financiers, and could result I decreasing stock prices.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with significant spending on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would allow the business to present brand-new ingenious items with less danger of converting the spending on R&D into sunk cost.
2. It would supply a positive signal to the financiers, as the general possessions of the business would increase with its considerable R&D costs.
3. It would not impact the earnings margins of the business at a large rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would offer the business a strong long term market position in regards to the company's overall wealth along with in regards to innovative items.
1. Risk of conversion of R&D spending into sunk expense, greater than option 1 lower than alternative 2.
2. Risk of misconception about the acquisitions, greater than alternative 2 and lesser than alternative 1.
3. Introduction of less number of ingenious products than alternative 2 and high variety of innovative products than alternative 1.

Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up Conclusion

RecommendationsIt has actually institutionalised its strategies and culture to align itself with the market changes and customer habits, which has actually ultimately enabled it to sustain its market share. Business has actually established significant market share and brand identity in the metropolitan markets, it is suggested that the company must focus on the rural areas in terms of developing brand commitment, awareness, and equity, such can be done by producing a specific brand name allotment strategy through trade marketing methods, that draw clear distinction in between Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up products and other competitor items.

Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
Governmental assistance

Transforming standards of worldwide food.
Enhanced market share.
Transforming assumption in the direction of much healthier items
Improvements in R&D and also QA departments.

Introduction of E-marketing.
No such impact as it is beneficial.
Issues over recycling.

Use of sources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Highest given that 2000
Highest possible after Service with less development than Business 2nd Least expensive
R&D Spending Highest possible because 2006 Greatest after Organisation 2nd Least expensive
Net Profit Margin Greatest given that 2001 with fast growth from 2003 to 2019 Because of sale of Alcon in 2017. Almost equal to Kraft Foods Consolidation Almost equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nourishment and also wellness variable Highest number of brands with lasting practices Biggest confectionary and refined foods brand worldwide Biggest milk products and also bottled water brand on the planet
Segmentation Center and top center degree customers worldwide Private clients together with home team Every age as well as Earnings Customer Groups Center and upper center degree consumers worldwide
Number of Brands 3rd 8th 4th 8th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 56452 175118 753765 435453 393353
Net Profit Margin 4.48% 3.79% 97.74% 6.49% 15.26%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 79.71 2.91 7.32 8.45 48.54
Total Asset 533465 236524 637888 595177 17319
Total Debt 36718 85997 44276 43694 39458
Debt Ratio 19% 86% 16% 49% 19%
R&D Spending 5152 4759 7214 3353 7562
R&D Spending as % of Sales 8.85% 3.78% 1.89% 6.55% 1.68%

Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up Executive Summary Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up Swot Analysis Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up Vrio Analysis Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up Pestel Analysis
Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up Porters Analysis Cambridge Technology Partners 1991 Start Up Recommendations