Menu

Areva Case Study Help

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Harvard >> Areva >>

Areva Case Study Analysis

Business is presently one of the most significant food chains worldwide. It was founded by Henri Areva in 1866, a German Pharmacist who first introduced "FarineLactee"; a combination of flour and milk to feed infants and decrease death rate.
Business is now a multinational company. Unlike other international companies, it has senior executives from different countries and attempts to make choices thinking about the entire world. Areva currently has more than 500 factories worldwide and a network spread throughout 86 nations.

Purpose

The purpose of Business Corporation is to improve the quality of life of people by playing its part and providing healthy food. While making sure that the company is succeeding in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a much better and healthy future

Vision

Areva's vision is to offer its customers with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to consume. Business envisions to develop a trained labor force which would help the business to grow
.

Mission

Areva's mission is that as presently, it is the leading company in the food market, it thinks in 'Excellent Food, Good Life". Its objective is to supply its customers with a variety of options that are healthy and finest in taste. It is focused on supplying the best food to its consumers throughout the day and night.

Products.

Business has a wide range of products that it uses to its clients. Its items include food for babies, cereals, dairy products, treats, chocolates, food for animal and mineral water. It has around four hundred and fifty (450) factories all over the world and around 328,000 staff members. In 2011, Business was listed as the most rewarding organization.

Goals and Objectives

• Remembering the vision and mission of the corporation, the business has actually put down its objectives and objectives. These objectives and objectives are listed below.
• One goal of the company is to reach zero garbage dump status. It is pursuing no waste, where no waste of the factory is landfilled. It encourages its workers to take the most out of the spin-offs. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another objective of Areva is to lose minimum food during production. Most often, the food produced is wasted even before it reaches the clients.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to improve its packaging in such a way that it would help it to minimize the above-mentioned issues and would also guarantee the shipment of high quality of its items to its customers.
• Meet international standards of the environment.
• Build a relationship based on trust with its consumers, company partners, workers, and government.

Critical Issues

Just Recently, Business Company is focusing more towards the strategy of NHW and investing more of its profits on the R&D innovation. The country is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW method. The target of the company is not achieved as the sales were expected to grow greater at the rate of 10% per year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, offered in Exhibit H.

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The existing Business strategy is based on the principle of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This technique handles the idea to bringing change in the consumer choices about food and making the food stuff much healthier concerning about the health problems.
The vision of this strategy is based on the key method i.e. 60/40+ which simply implies that the products will have a rating of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based upon its dietary worth. The items will be made with additional nutritional value in contrast to all other products in market getting it a plus on its dietary material.
This technique was adopted to bring more tasty plus healthy foods and drinks in market than ever. In competitors with other companies, with an intention of keeping its trust over consumers as Business Company has gained more trusted by customers.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Spending as a percentage of sales are declining with increasing actual amount of spending reveals that the sales are increasing at a greater rate than its R&D spending, and allow the business to more invest in R&D.
Net Earnings Margin is increasing while R&D as a percentage of sales is declining. This indication also shows a green light to the R&D spending, mergers and acquisitions.
Debt ratio of the company is increasing due to its costs on mergers, acquisitions and R&D development rather than payment of debts. This increasing debt ratio posture a risk of default of Business to its investors and might lead a decreasing share prices. In terms of increasing debt ratio, the firm should not spend much on R&D and should pay its present debts to reduce the danger for investors.
The increasing risk of investors with increasing debt ratio and declining share rates can be observed by substantial decline of EPS of Areva stocks.
The sales development of company is likewise low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception building of customers. This sluggish development likewise hinder company to additional spend on its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Note: All the above analysis is done on the basis of calculations and Graphs given up the Exhibitions D and E.

TWOS Analysis


TWOS analysis can be utilized to obtain various techniques based upon the SWOT Analysis provided above. A short summary of TWOS Analysis is given in Exhibition H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business needs to present more innovative items by big amount of R&D Spending and mergers and acquisitions. It could increase the marketplace share of Business and increase the revenue margins for the business. It might likewise supply Business a long term competitive benefit over its rivals.
The international growth of Business must be concentrated on market recording of establishing nations by expansion, drawing in more clients through client's loyalty. As developing nations are more populated than industrialized nations, it could increase the client circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisAreva should do careful acquisition and merger of companies, as it might affect the customer's and society's perceptions about Business. It must acquire and merge with those companies which have a market track record of healthy and nutritious companies. It would enhance the understandings of consumers about Business.
Business ought to not just spend its R&D on innovation, rather than it needs to also concentrate on the R&D spending over assessment of cost of various healthy products. This would increase expense effectiveness of its products, which will result in increasing its sales, due to decreasing rates, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business ought to move to not only establishing however likewise to industrialized nations. It must expand its circle to various nations like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus countries.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

Areva needs to sensibly control its acquisitions to prevent the threat of misconception from the customers about Business. It ought to get and merge with those nations having a goodwill of being a healthy business in the market. This would not just improve the perception of consumers about Business however would also increase the sales, revenue margins and market share of Business. It would likewise make it possible for the company to utilize its prospective resources effectively on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those companies slowing the NHW method growth.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The group segmentation of Business is based upon 4 elements; age, gender, income and profession. Business produces numerous items related to children i.e. Cerelac, Nido, and so on and related to adults i.e. confectionary products. Areva items are quite inexpensive by almost all levels, but its significant targeted consumers, in regards to earnings level are middle and upper middle level clients.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical division of Business is composed of its presence in practically 86 countries. Its geographical division is based upon 2 main factors i.e. typical earnings level of the customer along with the environment of the area. For instance, Singapore Business Business's division is done on the basis of the weather of the region i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic division of Business is based upon the personality and life style of the consumer. Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those customers whose life design is rather hectic and don't have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Areva behavioral division is based upon the mindset understanding and awareness of the customer. For instance its extremely nutritious items target those clients who have a health conscious mindset towards their intakes.

Areva Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand in the market and keep the consumer intact with the brand name, there are 2 choices:
Alternative: 1
The Company should invest more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase total assets of the business, increasing the wealth of the company. Spending on R&D would be sunk expense.
2. The company can resell the acquired systems in the market, if it fails to execute its technique. Nevertheless, amount spend on the R&D might not be revived, and it will be considered totally sunk expense, if it do not provide prospective results.
3. Spending on R&D provide slow development in sales, as it takes very long time to present a product. Acquisitions supply fast outcomes, as it supply the business already developed item, which can be marketed soon after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of business's which do not fit with the business's worths like Kraftz foods can lead the company to deal with mistaken belief of customers about Business core worths of healthy and nutritious items.
2 Large spending on acquisitions than R&D would send out a signal of company's inadequacy of establishing innovative products, and would results in consumer's frustration.
3. Big acquisitions than R&D would extend the line of product of the company by the products which are already present in the market, making business unable to present brand-new ingenious products.
Option: 2.
The Company should spend more on its R&D instead of acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would allow the business to produce more innovative products.
2. It would supply the company a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would allow the business to increase its targeted clients by introducing those products which can be provided to a completely new market sector.
4. Ingenious products will offer long term benefits and high market share in long run.
Cons:
1. It would reduce the earnings margins of the business.
2. In case of failure, the entire spending on R&D would be thought about as sunk expense, and would impact the business at large. The risk is not in the case of acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of business, which might offer a negative signal to the investors, and might result I declining stock rates.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with considerable spending on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would allow the company to introduce brand-new ingenious items with less danger of transforming the spending on R&D into sunk cost.
2. It would supply a favorable signal to the investors, as the overall assets of the company would increase with its substantial R&D costs.
3. It would not impact the revenue margins of the company at a large rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would supply the business a strong long term market position in regards to the company's total wealth in addition to in terms of ingenious items.
Cons:
1. Threat of conversion of R&D costs into sunk cost, greater than alternative 1 lesser than alternative 2.
2. Risk of mistaken belief about the acquisitions, higher than alternative 2 and lesser than option 1.
3. Intro of less number of innovative items than alternative 2 and high number of innovative products than alternative 1.

Areva Conclusion

RecommendationsIt has institutionalized its techniques and culture to align itself with the market changes and customer habits, which has eventually permitted it to sustain its market share. Business has developed substantial market share and brand identity in the urban markets, it is suggested that the company needs to focus on the rural areas in terms of developing brand loyalty, awareness, and equity, such can be done by creating a particular brand name allowance strategy through trade marketing strategies, that draw clear distinction between Areva products and other competitor products.

Areva Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental assistance

Altering requirements of global food.
Improved market share. Changing perception in the direction of healthier products Improvements in R&D as well as QA departments.

Intro of E-marketing.
No such effect as it is beneficial. Concerns over recycling.

Use resources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Highest possible considering that 7000 Highest possible after Organisation with much less development than Service 4th Cheapest
R&D Spending Highest possible because 2003 Highest possible after Organisation 7th Least expensive
Net Profit Margin Greatest given that 2004 with rapid growth from 2009 to 2018 Due to sale of Alcon in 2011. Virtually equal to Kraft Foods Consolidation Nearly equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nutrition as well as wellness aspect Highest possible variety of brands with lasting practices Biggest confectionary and refined foods brand name in the world Biggest milk items as well as mineral water brand name in the world
Segmentation Middle and also upper middle degree consumers worldwide Individual consumers in addition to home group Every age and Revenue Client Teams Center and top center degree customers worldwide
Number of Brands 1st 6th 4th 5th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 15949 464566 744276 725392 738392
Net Profit Margin 2.96% 9.44% 56.59% 2.72% 26.41%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 46.25 7.64 6.68 4.81 57.82
Total Asset 687753 566127 471149 586515 36181
Total Debt 24161 96341 36618 27358 18664
Debt Ratio 13% 68% 61% 21% 95%
R&D Spending 4263 7538 8555 9699 8373
R&D Spending as % of Sales 6.31% 6.12% 7.13% 7.43% 8.79%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations