Menu

Southport Minerals Inc Case Study Analysis

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Harvard >> Southport Minerals Inc >>

Southport Minerals Inc Case Study Help

Southport Minerals Inc is presently among the greatest food chains worldwide. It was founded by Harvard in 1866, a German Pharmacist who initially launched "FarineLactee"; a combination of flour and milk to feed infants and decrease death rate. At the very same time, the Page brothers from Switzerland also discovered The Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Business. The 2 became competitors at first however in the future combined in 1905, resulting in the birth of Southport Minerals Inc.
Business is now a transnational business. Unlike other international business, it has senior executives from different countries and tries to make choices thinking about the whole world. Southport Minerals Inc presently has more than 500 factories worldwide and a network spread across 86 countries.

Purpose

The purpose of Southport Minerals Inc Corporation is to enhance the lifestyle of people by playing its part and offering healthy food. It wants to help the world in shaping a healthy and better future for it. It likewise wishes to encourage individuals to live a healthy life. While making sure that the company is being successful in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a better and healthy future

Vision

Southport Minerals Inc's vision is to supply its consumers with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to eat. Business envisions to establish a well-trained workforce which would help the company to grow
.

Mission

Southport Minerals Inc's objective is that as presently, it is the leading company in the food industry, it believes in 'Great Food, Good Life". Its mission is to offer its consumers with a variety of choices that are healthy and finest in taste. It is focused on offering the best food to its clients throughout the day and night.

Products.

Business has a vast array of items that it provides to its consumers. Its items consist of food for infants, cereals, dairy items, treats, chocolates, food for family pet and bottled water. It has around four hundred and fifty (450) factories all over the world and around 328,000 workers. In 2011, Business was listed as the most gainful company.

Goals and Objectives

• Bearing in mind the vision and mission of the corporation, the company has set its objectives and goals. These goals and objectives are listed below.
• One objective of the business is to reach no garbage dump status. It is pursuing zero waste, where no waste of the factory is landfilled. It motivates its employees to take the most out of the spin-offs. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another goal of Southport Minerals Inc is to waste minimum food throughout production. Usually, the food produced is wasted even prior to it reaches the clients.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to improve its packaging in such a method that it would help it to reduce the above-mentioned issues and would likewise ensure the shipment of high quality of its items to its consumers.
• Meet worldwide requirements of the environment.
• Build a relationship based on trust with its consumers, company partners, employees, and federal government.

Critical Issues

Just Recently, Business Company is focusing more towards the technique of NHW and investing more of its profits on the R&D technology. The country is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW method. Nevertheless, the target of the business is not attained as the sales were expected to grow higher at the rate of 10% per year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given in Display H. There is a requirement to focus more on the sales then the development technology. Otherwise, it may lead to the decreased income rate. (Henderson, 2012).

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The present Business method is based on the principle of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This method handles the idea to bringing modification in the customer choices about food and making the food stuff healthier worrying about the health concerns.
The vision of this strategy is based on the secret approach i.e. 60/40+ which just means that the products will have a score of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based on its nutritional value. The items will be manufactured with extra nutritional value in contrast to all other items in market gaining it a plus on its dietary content.
This strategy was embraced to bring more yummy plus nutritious foods and drinks in market than ever. In competitors with other business, with an intent of retaining its trust over customers as Business Company has actually gotten more trusted by clients.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Spending as a percentage of sales are decreasing with increasing real amount of spending reveals that the sales are increasing at a greater rate than its R&D spending, and permit the company to more spend on R&D.
Net Earnings Margin is increasing while R&D as a percentage of sales is decreasing. This indicator likewise shows a thumbs-up to the R&D spending, mergers and acquisitions.
Financial obligation ratio of the company is increasing due to its spending on mergers, acquisitions and R&D development rather than payment of financial obligations. This increasing financial obligation ratio position a risk of default of Business to its financiers and could lead a decreasing share rates. In terms of increasing financial obligation ratio, the company needs to not spend much on R&D and needs to pay its present financial obligations to reduce the danger for investors.
The increasing danger of financiers with increasing financial obligation ratio and declining share rates can be observed by huge decrease of EPS of Southport Minerals Inc stocks.
The sales growth of company is also low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception building of customers. This slow development likewise prevent company to additional invest in its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Note: All the above analysis is done on the basis of estimations and Charts given up the Exhibits D and E.

TWOS Analysis


2 analysis can be utilized to obtain numerous methods based on the SWOT Analysis given above. A short summary of TWOS Analysis is given up Exhibit H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business ought to present more innovative items by large quantity of R&D Spending and mergers and acquisitions. It might increase the marketplace share of Business and increase the profit margins for the company. It might likewise offer Business a long term competitive advantage over its rivals.
The worldwide expansion of Business must be focused on market catching of establishing nations by expansion, bring in more customers through client's commitment. As developing countries are more populous than developed nations, it could increase the client circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisSouthport Minerals Inc needs to do cautious acquisition and merger of companies, as it might affect the consumer's and society's perceptions about Business. It must acquire and combine with those companies which have a market credibility of healthy and nutritious business. It would enhance the perceptions of consumers about Business.
Business needs to not just invest its R&D on innovation, instead of it must also focus on the R&D costs over examination of cost of numerous healthy items. This would increase expense efficiency of its items, which will lead to increasing its sales, due to declining prices, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business ought to relocate to not only establishing but also to developed countries. It needs to widens its geographical expansion. This wide geographical growth towards establishing and developed nations would minimize the threat of prospective losses in times of instability in numerous nations. It ought to expand its circle to various nations like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus nations.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

It should get and combine with those countries having a goodwill of being a healthy business in the market. It would also allow the company to utilize its potential resources effectively on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those companies slowing the NHW technique development.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The group division of Business is based on four aspects; age, gender, earnings and profession. For example, Business produces several items connected to infants i.e. Cerelac, Nido, etc. and associated to adults i.e. confectionary items. Southport Minerals Inc items are rather inexpensive by nearly all levels, however its significant targeted consumers, in regards to income level are middle and upper middle level customers.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical division of Business is made up of its presence in nearly 86 countries. Its geographical division is based upon 2 main factors i.e. average income level of the customer along with the climate of the region. Singapore Business Company's segmentation is done on the basis of the weather of the area i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic division of Business is based upon the personality and life style of the consumer. For instance, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those clients whose lifestyle is quite busy and do not have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Southport Minerals Inc behavioral division is based upon the mindset understanding and awareness of the customer. For instance its highly nutritious products target those consumers who have a health conscious mindset towards their intakes.

Southport Minerals Inc Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand in the market and keep the client undamaged with the brand, there are 2 choices:
Option: 1
The Business must invest more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase total properties of the company, increasing the wealth of the business. Spending on R&D would be sunk expense.
2. The business can resell the obtained systems in the market, if it stops working to execute its strategy. Amount spend on the R&D could not be restored, and it will be thought about entirely sunk expense, if it do not give potential results.
3. Spending on R&D provide sluggish development in sales, as it takes long time to present a product. However, acquisitions supply fast outcomes, as it supply the business already developed product, which can be marketed right after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of business's which do not fit with the business's values like Kraftz foods can lead the company to deal with misconception of consumers about Business core values of healthy and nutritious items.
2 Large spending on acquisitions than R&D would send a signal of company's inefficiency of establishing ingenious items, and would results in consumer's dissatisfaction as well.
3. Large acquisitions than R&D would extend the line of product of the company by the items which are already present in the market, making business unable to present new ingenious products.
Option: 2.
The Business should spend more on its R&D instead of acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would make it possible for the company to produce more innovative products.
2. It would supply the business a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would enable the company to increase its targeted clients by presenting those items which can be offered to a totally new market segment.
4. Innovative products will supply long term benefits and high market share in long term.
Cons:
1. It would decrease the earnings margins of the business.
2. In case of failure, the entire costs on R&D would be thought about as sunk cost, and would impact the business at large. The threat is not in the case of acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of company, which might supply a negative signal to the financiers, and could result I decreasing stock prices.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with significant spending on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would permit the company to present new innovative products with less threat of converting the costs on R&D into sunk expense.
2. It would supply a positive signal to the financiers, as the general possessions of the business would increase with its substantial R&D spending.
3. It would not impact the profit margins of the business at a big rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would offer the company a strong long term market position in terms of the company's overall wealth in addition to in regards to ingenious products.
Cons:
1. Risk of conversion of R&D spending into sunk cost, higher than option 1 lesser than alternative 2.
2. Threat of misconception about the acquisitions, greater than alternative 2 and lesser than alternative 1.
3. Introduction of less number of innovative items than alternative 2 and high variety of ingenious items than alternative 1.

Southport Minerals Inc Conclusion

RecommendationsIt has institutionalised its methods and culture to align itself with the market modifications and client behavior, which has eventually permitted it to sustain its market share. Business has established considerable market share and brand name identity in the urban markets, it is suggested that the business ought to focus on the rural locations in terms of developing brand loyalty, awareness, and equity, such can be done by developing a particular brand allocation technique through trade marketing strategies, that draw clear difference between Southport Minerals Inc items and other rival products.

Southport Minerals Inc Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental assistance

Transforming standards of global food.
Boosted market share. Changing perception in the direction of healthier items Improvements in R&D and QA divisions.

Intro of E-marketing.
No such effect as it is favourable. Issues over recycling.

Use of sources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Greatest since 6000 Highest after Business with less growth than Service 6th Most affordable
R&D Spending Highest possible because 2003 Highest possible after Business 9th Cheapest
Net Profit Margin Greatest considering that 2002 with rapid development from 2004 to 2013 Because of sale of Alcon in 2019. Nearly equal to Kraft Foods Unification Practically equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nourishment and also wellness element Highest possible number of brands with lasting practices Largest confectionary and refined foods brand on the planet Largest dairy items and also mineral water brand worldwide
Segmentation Center as well as upper center degree consumers worldwide Individual clients in addition to home team Any age as well as Revenue Client Teams Middle as well as upper middle degree consumers worldwide
Number of Brands 5th 1st 7th 6th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 35716 742495 392973 574116 115193
Net Profit Margin 5.19% 3.62% 22.18% 3.18% 55.46%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 72.52 2.17 1.58 7.56 56.63
Total Asset 997715 571745 599257 988637 18757
Total Debt 87749 24355 61233 28468 81692
Debt Ratio 64% 89% 12% 37% 61%
R&D Spending 7466 8394 1669 2489 7879
R&D Spending as % of Sales 2.53% 6.34% 5.74% 1.25% 8.44%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations