Menu

Levendary Cafe The China Challenge Case Study Analysis

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Harvard >> Levendary Cafe The China Challenge >>

Levendary Cafe The China Challenge Case Study Solution

Business is presently one of the biggest food chains worldwide. It was founded by Henri Levendary Cafe The China Challenge in 1866, a German Pharmacist who first introduced "FarineLactee"; a mix of flour and milk to feed infants and decrease mortality rate.
Business is now a transnational business. Unlike other international business, it has senior executives from various nations and tries to make decisions thinking about the entire world. Levendary Cafe The China Challenge currently has more than 500 factories worldwide and a network spread throughout 86 nations.

Purpose

The purpose of Business Corporation is to improve the quality of life of individuals by playing its part and providing healthy food. While making sure that the business is being successful in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a much better and healthy future

Vision

Levendary Cafe The China Challenge's vision is to provide its customers with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to consume. Business pictures to develop a trained workforce which would help the company to grow
.

Mission

Levendary Cafe The China Challenge's mission is that as currently, it is the leading business in the food market, it believes in 'Good Food, Great Life". Its mission is to offer its consumers with a variety of options that are healthy and best in taste also. It is focused on supplying the very best food to its consumers throughout the day and night.

Products.

Business has a large range of items that it uses to its customers. Its products include food for infants, cereals, dairy items, snacks, chocolates, food for animal and mineral water. It has around 4 hundred and fifty (450) factories around the world and around 328,000 staff members. In 2011, Business was noted as the most rewarding company.

Goals and Objectives

• Bearing in mind the vision and mission of the corporation, the company has actually put down its objectives and goals. These goals and goals are noted below.
• One objective of the company is to reach zero land fill status. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another goal of Levendary Cafe The China Challenge is to waste minimum food during production. Usually, the food produced is wasted even before it reaches the consumers.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to enhance its product packaging in such a method that it would help it to minimize the above-mentioned issues and would also ensure the delivery of high quality of its products to its customers.
• Meet worldwide requirements of the environment.
• Construct a relationship based on trust with its consumers, company partners, employees, and federal government.

Critical Issues

Just Recently, Business Company is focusing more towards the strategy of NHW and investing more of its profits on the R&D technology. The nation is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW technique. The target of the business is not accomplished as the sales were expected to grow greater at the rate of 10% per year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given in Display H.

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The existing Business technique is based on the concept of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This technique deals with the concept to bringing change in the client preferences about food and making the food things much healthier worrying about the health concerns.
The vision of this method is based on the key technique i.e. 60/40+ which simply implies that the items will have a score of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based upon its nutritional worth. The products will be produced with extra nutritional value in contrast to all other items in market acquiring it a plus on its dietary content.
This strategy was embraced to bring more yummy plus nutritious foods and beverages in market than ever. In competition with other business, with an intent of retaining its trust over clients as Business Company has gotten more relied on by clients.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Costs as a portion of sales are decreasing with increasing actual quantity of spending reveals that the sales are increasing at a greater rate than its R&D spending, and allow the company to more spend on R&D.
Net Earnings Margin is increasing while R&D as a percentage of sales is declining. This sign also reveals a thumbs-up to the R&D spending, mergers and acquisitions.
Debt ratio of the business is increasing due to its spending on mergers, acquisitions and R&D development instead of payment of debts. This increasing debt ratio present a hazard of default of Business to its financiers and could lead a declining share costs. For that reason, in terms of increasing debt ratio, the company must not invest much on R&D and needs to pay its existing financial obligations to reduce the risk for investors.
The increasing danger of investors with increasing financial obligation ratio and declining share costs can be observed by huge decrease of EPS of Levendary Cafe The China Challenge stocks.
The sales development of business is also low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow understanding structure of customers. This sluggish development also impede business to more invest in its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Note: All the above analysis is done on the basis of calculations and Charts given up the Exhibits D and E.

TWOS Analysis


TWOS analysis can be used to derive numerous strategies based on the SWOT Analysis offered above. A short summary of TWOS Analysis is given up Exhibition H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business must present more innovative products by large amount of R&D Spending and mergers and acquisitions. It might increase the market share of Business and increase the earnings margins for the company. It might likewise offer Business a long term competitive advantage over its rivals.
The worldwide expansion of Business should be focused on market recording of establishing nations by expansion, drawing in more customers through customer's commitment. As establishing countries are more populous than developed countries, it might increase the consumer circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisLevendary Cafe The China Challenge needs to do cautious acquisition and merger of organizations, as it could affect the client's and society's understandings about Business. It ought to get and merge with those companies which have a market reputation of healthy and nutritious companies. It would improve the understandings of customers about Business.
Business ought to not only invest its R&D on development, rather than it must also focus on the R&D spending over examination of cost of different nutritious items. This would increase cost effectiveness of its items, which will result in increasing its sales, due to declining costs, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business must transfer to not just developing however likewise to developed countries. It ought to broadens its geographical growth. This large geographical growth towards developing and developed nations would lower the threat of possible losses in times of instability in numerous countries. It needs to widen its circle to numerous countries like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus nations.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

Levendary Cafe The China Challenge ought to wisely manage its acquisitions to avoid the threat of mistaken belief from the consumers about Business. It should obtain and merge with those countries having a goodwill of being a healthy company in the market. This would not only improve the understanding of consumers about Business but would likewise increase the sales, profit margins and market share of Business. It would likewise make it possible for the business to use its prospective resources efficiently on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those organizations slowing the NHW method development.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The group segmentation of Business is based upon 4 factors; age, gender, earnings and occupation. Business produces several products related to children i.e. Cerelac, Nido, etc. and associated to grownups i.e. confectionary items. Levendary Cafe The China Challenge items are quite economical by nearly all levels, but its major targeted clients, in regards to earnings level are middle and upper middle level consumers.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical segmentation of Business is composed of its existence in practically 86 countries. Its geographical division is based upon 2 main elements i.e. average income level of the consumer along with the climate of the area. For example, Singapore Business Company's division is done on the basis of the weather of the region i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic segmentation of Business is based upon the character and lifestyle of the client. For example, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those clients whose life style is rather busy and don't have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Levendary Cafe The China Challenge behavioral division is based upon the attitude understanding and awareness of the client. For instance its extremely nutritious products target those clients who have a health mindful mindset towards their consumptions.

Levendary Cafe The China Challenge Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand name in the market and keep the customer intact with the brand name, there are 2 choices:
Alternative: 1
The Business ought to invest more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase total assets of the business, increasing the wealth of the business. Nevertheless, costs on R&D would be sunk cost.
2. The business can resell the gotten systems in the market, if it stops working to implement its strategy. Amount spend on the R&D might not be revived, and it will be considered entirely sunk cost, if it do not offer possible outcomes.
3. Spending on R&D offer slow development in sales, as it takes long period of time to introduce an item. However, acquisitions offer fast outcomes, as it provide the company currently developed item, which can be marketed right after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of company's which do not fit with the company's worths like Kraftz foods can lead the company to deal with misconception of customers about Business core worths of healthy and nutritious items.
2 Big costs on acquisitions than R&D would send out a signal of business's ineffectiveness of establishing innovative products, and would results in consumer's dissatisfaction also.
3. Large acquisitions than R&D would extend the product line of the company by the products which are already present in the market, making company not able to introduce brand-new ingenious products.
Option: 2.
The Business needs to spend more on its R&D rather than acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would allow the business to produce more ingenious items.
2. It would offer the company a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would allow the company to increase its targeted consumers by presenting those products which can be provided to a completely brand-new market segment.
4. Ingenious products will offer long term advantages and high market share in long run.
Cons:
1. It would reduce the earnings margins of the business.
2. In case of failure, the whole spending on R&D would be considered as sunk expense, and would impact the business at big. The threat is not when it comes to acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of business, which could offer an unfavorable signal to the financiers, and could result I declining stock rates.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with considerable spending on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would enable the business to present new innovative products with less risk of converting the spending on R&D into sunk cost.
2. It would offer a positive signal to the investors, as the overall assets of the company would increase with its significant R&D spending.
3. It would not impact the profit margins of the business at a large rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would offer the business a strong long term market position in regards to the company's total wealth in addition to in terms of innovative items.
Cons:
1. Danger of conversion of R&D spending into sunk cost, greater than option 1 lower than alternative 2.
2. Risk of misconception about the acquisitions, higher than alternative 2 and lesser than alternative 1.
3. Intro of less variety of ingenious products than alternative 2 and high variety of innovative items than alternative 1.

Levendary Cafe The China Challenge Conclusion

RecommendationsIt has actually institutionalised its methods and culture to align itself with the market changes and client behavior, which has ultimately allowed it to sustain its market share. Business has actually established substantial market share and brand identity in the urban markets, it is recommended that the business needs to focus on the rural areas in terms of establishing brand loyalty, awareness, and equity, such can be done by creating a particular brand name allocation technique through trade marketing strategies, that draw clear difference in between Levendary Cafe The China Challenge products and other competitor items.

Levendary Cafe The China Challenge Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental assistance

Changing standards of global food.
Boosted market share. Transforming assumption in the direction of much healthier products Improvements in R&D and also QA divisions.

Introduction of E-marketing.
No such influence as it is beneficial. Worries over recycling.

Use sources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Greatest because 4000 Highest possible after Organisation with less development than Service 4th Lowest
R&D Spending Greatest because 2004 Greatest after Service 3rd Lowest
Net Profit Margin Highest possible because 2008 with quick development from 2008 to 2017 Due to sale of Alcon in 2012. Almost equal to Kraft Foods Consolidation Nearly equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nourishment and also wellness factor Greatest variety of brand names with lasting methods Biggest confectionary and processed foods brand worldwide Biggest milk products and bottled water brand in the world
Segmentation Middle and also top center level consumers worldwide Private customers together with home group Any age and also Income Consumer Teams Middle and upper center degree customers worldwide
Number of Brands 7th 7th 3rd 1st

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 71963 363567 471941 446786 163421
Net Profit Margin 8.81% 7.57% 81.11% 4.41% 63.13%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 65.22 5.17 5.43 6.44 72.91
Total Asset 759785 142866 445958 241965 99131
Total Debt 29169 26291 11828 34577 79857
Debt Ratio 53% 67% 31% 22% 77%
R&D Spending 3524 4625 4638 2314 3683
R&D Spending as % of Sales 9.75% 8.88% 1.25% 3.45% 3.41%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations