Menu

Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools Case Study Analysis

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Harvard >> Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools >>

Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools Case Study Solution

Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools is currently one of the most significant food cycle worldwide. It was founded by Harvard in 1866, a German Pharmacist who initially introduced "FarineLactee"; a combination of flour and milk to feed babies and reduce mortality rate. At the exact same time, the Page siblings from Switzerland also found The Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Business. The two ended up being rivals at first but later merged in 1905, leading to the birth of Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools.
Business is now a global company. Unlike other international companies, it has senior executives from different countries and attempts to make choices thinking about the entire world. Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools presently has more than 500 factories around the world and a network spread throughout 86 countries.

Purpose

The purpose of Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools Corporation is to boost the lifestyle of people by playing its part and supplying healthy food. It wishes to help the world in forming a healthy and better future for it. It also wants to encourage people to live a healthy life. While ensuring that the company is prospering in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a much better and healthy future

Vision

Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools's vision is to offer its consumers with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to eat. Business visualizes to develop a well-trained workforce which would help the business to grow
.

Mission

Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools's objective is that as presently, it is the leading company in the food market, it thinks in 'Excellent Food, Great Life". Its mission is to offer its customers with a range of options that are healthy and best in taste too. It is concentrated on offering the very best food to its consumers throughout the day and night.

Products.

Business has a large range of products that it uses to its customers. Its products include food for babies, cereals, dairy items, snacks, chocolates, food for animal and bottled water. It has around four hundred and fifty (450) factories worldwide and around 328,000 employees. In 2011, Business was noted as the most rewarding company.

Goals and Objectives

• Bearing in mind the vision and objective of the corporation, the business has actually set its goals and goals. These objectives and goals are listed below.
• One goal of the business is to reach zero garbage dump status. It is working toward absolutely no waste, where no waste of the factory is landfilled. It encourages its workers to take the most out of the by-products. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another goal of Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools is to lose minimum food during production. Frequently, the food produced is lost even before it reaches the clients.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to enhance its packaging in such a way that it would help it to lower the above-mentioned complications and would likewise ensure the shipment of high quality of its items to its customers.
• Meet international standards of the environment.
• Develop a relationship based on trust with its consumers, service partners, workers, and federal government.

Critical Issues

Recently, Business Company is focusing more towards the method of NHW and investing more of its revenues on the R&D innovation. The nation is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW method. The target of the business is not achieved as the sales were anticipated to grow greater at the rate of 10% per year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, provided in Exhibit H.

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The present Business strategy is based upon the idea of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This technique deals with the idea to bringing change in the consumer preferences about food and making the food things much healthier concerning about the health issues.
The vision of this strategy is based on the secret approach i.e. 60/40+ which just implies that the items will have a score of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based upon its nutritional value. The products will be manufactured with additional nutritional value in contrast to all other items in market getting it a plus on its dietary material.
This strategy was adopted to bring more tasty plus healthy foods and drinks in market than ever. In competition with other business, with an intent of keeping its trust over clients as Business Company has actually gotten more relied on by clients.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Spending as a portion of sales are decreasing with increasing real amount of costs reveals that the sales are increasing at a higher rate than its R&D costs, and permit the business to more invest in R&D.
Net Revenue Margin is increasing while R&D as a percentage of sales is declining. This sign likewise reveals a thumbs-up to the R&D costs, mergers and acquisitions.
Financial obligation ratio of the business is increasing due to its spending on mergers, acquisitions and R&D advancement instead of payment of financial obligations. This increasing debt ratio posture a hazard of default of Business to its investors and could lead a declining share prices. In terms of increasing debt ratio, the firm needs to not invest much on R&D and should pay its present debts to decrease the danger for financiers.
The increasing danger of investors with increasing financial obligation ratio and declining share prices can be observed by substantial decrease of EPS of Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools stocks.
The sales growth of business is also low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception structure of consumers. This slow development also hinder company to further spend on its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Keep in mind: All the above analysis is done on the basis of computations and Graphs given in the Displays D and E.

TWOS Analysis


2 analysis can be used to obtain different techniques based on the SWOT Analysis given above. A quick summary of TWOS Analysis is given in Display H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business ought to present more ingenious products by large quantity of R&D Costs and mergers and acquisitions. It might increase the marketplace share of Business and increase the revenue margins for the business. It could likewise offer Business a long term competitive advantage over its competitors.
The worldwide growth of Business need to be concentrated on market catching of developing countries by expansion, attracting more clients through customer's loyalty. As developing nations are more populated than industrialized nations, it could increase the client circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisCanyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools ought to do cautious acquisition and merger of organizations, as it could affect the customer's and society's understandings about Business. It ought to acquire and combine with those companies which have a market track record of healthy and healthy business. It would enhance the understandings of customers about Business.
Business must not just spend its R&D on innovation, rather than it ought to likewise focus on the R&D spending over evaluation of expense of different nutritious products. This would increase expense effectiveness of its products, which will lead to increasing its sales, due to decreasing rates, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business ought to move to not just establishing however also to developed nations. It should expands its geographical growth. This large geographical growth towards establishing and developed countries would lower the threat of potential losses in times of instability in various nations. It ought to widen its circle to various countries like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus nations.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

It should obtain and merge with those countries having a goodwill of being a healthy company in the market. It would likewise make it possible for the company to utilize its potential resources effectively on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those organizations slowing the NHW technique development.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The group segmentation of Business is based on four aspects; age, gender, earnings and occupation. Business produces several items related to infants i.e. Cerelac, Nido, and so on and related to grownups i.e. confectionary products. Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools items are rather cost effective by nearly all levels, however its major targeted clients, in terms of income level are middle and upper middle level customers.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical division of Business is made up of its presence in almost 86 nations. Its geographical segmentation is based upon two main elements i.e. average earnings level of the customer in addition to the environment of the region. Singapore Business Business's segmentation is done on the basis of the weather condition of the region i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic segmentation of Business is based upon the personality and lifestyle of the client. For instance, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those customers whose lifestyle is rather busy and don't have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools behavioral segmentation is based upon the mindset understanding and awareness of the client. For example its highly healthy products target those consumers who have a health mindful attitude towards their usages.

Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand name in the market and keep the customer undamaged with the brand name, there are two options:
Alternative: 1
The Business must invest more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase total properties of the company, increasing the wealth of the business. Nevertheless, spending on R&D would be sunk cost.
2. The company can resell the gotten systems in the market, if it fails to implement its technique. Amount invest on the R&D might not be restored, and it will be considered entirely sunk expense, if it do not provide possible results.
3. Spending on R&D offer sluggish growth in sales, as it takes long time to present an item. Nevertheless, acquisitions offer quick results, as it offer the company currently established item, which can be marketed right after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of business's which do not fit with the business's values like Kraftz foods can lead the company to deal with misconception of customers about Business core worths of healthy and healthy products.
2 Large spending on acquisitions than R&D would send out a signal of business's ineffectiveness of establishing ingenious items, and would outcomes in consumer's dissatisfaction.
3. Large acquisitions than R&D would extend the line of product of the business by the products which are currently present in the market, making business unable to introduce new innovative items.
Option: 2.
The Company should invest more on its R&D instead of acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would make it possible for the business to produce more innovative items.
2. It would supply the business a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would enable the company to increase its targeted consumers by introducing those items which can be used to a completely new market segment.
4. Ingenious items will provide long term benefits and high market share in long term.
Cons:
1. It would decrease the revenue margins of the business.
2. In case of failure, the whole spending on R&D would be thought about as sunk expense, and would affect the company at large. The risk is not when it comes to acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of company, which could provide a negative signal to the financiers, and might result I decreasing stock prices.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with substantial costs on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would allow the business to present new innovative products with less risk of converting the spending on R&D into sunk expense.
2. It would supply a positive signal to the investors, as the total possessions of the company would increase with its significant R&D costs.
3. It would not impact the revenue margins of the business at a large rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would provide the company a strong long term market position in regards to the business's overall wealth as well as in regards to innovative items.
Cons:
1. Risk of conversion of R&D costs into sunk expense, higher than option 1 lesser than alternative 2.
2. Risk of misunderstanding about the acquisitions, higher than alternative 2 and lower than alternative 1.
3. Intro of less number of innovative products than alternative 2 and high number of innovative products than alternative 1.

Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools Conclusion

RecommendationsBusiness has actually stayed the leading market player for more than a years. It has institutionalized its strategies and culture to align itself with the marketplace modifications and consumer habits, which has actually ultimately enabled it to sustain its market share. Though, Business has developed considerable market share and brand name identity in the urban markets, it is recommended that the business ought to concentrate on the rural areas in regards to developing brand name loyalty, awareness, and equity, such can be done by developing a specific brand allotment strategy through trade marketing methods, that draw clear difference between Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools items and other competitor items. Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools must take advantage of its brand name image of safe and healthy food in catering the rural markets and also to upscale the offerings in other classifications such as nutrition. This will allow the company to establish brand equity for newly presented and already produced items on a greater platform, making the reliable use of resources and brand name image in the market.

Canyon Agassi Investing In Charter Schools Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental assistance

Changing standards of international food.
Enhanced market share. Transforming assumption towards much healthier items Improvements in R&D and QA departments.

Intro of E-marketing.
No such impact as it is beneficial. Issues over recycling.

Use of sources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Highest since 7000 Greatest after Service with much less growth than Company 7th Lowest
R&D Spending Greatest because 2009 Highest after Company 4th Cheapest
Net Profit Margin Greatest because 2004 with fast development from 2002 to 2017 As a result of sale of Alcon in 2012. Nearly equal to Kraft Foods Unification Almost equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nourishment as well as wellness element Highest possible number of brand names with lasting methods Biggest confectionary as well as processed foods brand on the planet Biggest dairy products and mineral water brand name worldwide
Segmentation Middle and also upper middle degree consumers worldwide Private customers together with house team Every age and also Income Customer Groups Middle as well as top middle level consumers worldwide
Number of Brands 9th 2nd 4th 4th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 73322 958954 922687 399212 652763
Net Profit Margin 3.67% 3.15% 84.68% 9.37% 66.94%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 31.85 3.14 9.14 7.32 51.67
Total Asset 739631 458161 455751 464714 32599
Total Debt 87237 85443 47812 99146 24196
Debt Ratio 12% 94% 19% 52% 16%
R&D Spending 2445 4392 7377 9482 5752
R&D Spending as % of Sales 8.13% 5.34% 2.97% 9.82% 1.79%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations