Menu

Canary Wharf Case Study Help

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Harvard >> Canary Wharf >>

Canary Wharf Case Study Analysis

Canary Wharf is presently one of the biggest food cycle worldwide. It was established by Harvard in 1866, a German Pharmacist who first launched "FarineLactee"; a mix of flour and milk to feed infants and decrease mortality rate. At the same time, the Page brothers from Switzerland likewise found The Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Business. The two became rivals initially however later merged in 1905, resulting in the birth of Canary Wharf.
Business is now a global company. Unlike other international companies, it has senior executives from different countries and attempts to make choices considering the whole world. Canary Wharf currently has more than 500 factories worldwide and a network spread across 86 countries.

Purpose

The function of Business Corporation is to improve the quality of life of people by playing its part and offering healthy food. While making sure that the business is being successful in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a better and healthy future

Vision

Canary Wharf's vision is to offer its clients with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to eat. It wishes to be innovative and at the same time comprehend the needs and requirements of its clients. Its vision is to grow quick and supply products that would please the needs of each age. Canary Wharf imagines to develop a well-trained workforce which would help the business to grow
.

Mission

Canary Wharf's objective is that as presently, it is the leading business in the food market, it believes in 'Great Food, Excellent Life". Its objective is to provide its customers with a range of options that are healthy and finest in taste. It is concentrated on offering the best food to its consumers throughout the day and night.

Products.

Business has a large range of items that it offers to its clients. Its products consist of food for infants, cereals, dairy items, treats, chocolates, food for animal and bottled water. It has around 4 hundred and fifty (450) factories worldwide and around 328,000 staff members. In 2011, Business was noted as the most rewarding company.

Goals and Objectives

• Remembering the vision and mission of the corporation, the company has put down its goals and goals. These goals and goals are listed below.
• One goal of the business is to reach absolutely no garbage dump status. It is pursuing no waste, where no waste of the factory is landfilled. It encourages its staff members to take the most out of the spin-offs. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another objective of Canary Wharf is to squander minimum food throughout production. Most often, the food produced is squandered even before it reaches the customers.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to enhance its product packaging in such a way that it would help it to decrease those complications and would likewise guarantee the shipment of high quality of its products to its customers.
• Meet worldwide requirements of the environment.
• Construct a relationship based on trust with its consumers, organisation partners, staff members, and government.

Critical Issues

Just Recently, Business Company is focusing more towards the technique of NHW and investing more of its profits on the R&D technology. The country is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW method. The target of the business is not achieved as the sales were expected to grow greater at the rate of 10% per year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, offered in Exhibition H.

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The current Business strategy is based on the concept of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This method deals with the concept to bringing change in the client preferences about food and making the food things healthier concerning about the health concerns.
The vision of this method is based upon the secret method i.e. 60/40+ which simply indicates that the items will have a score of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based upon its dietary worth. The items will be made with additional nutritional worth in contrast to all other products in market getting it a plus on its nutritional material.
This strategy was embraced to bring more yummy plus healthy foods and drinks in market than ever. In competition with other business, with an objective of keeping its trust over consumers as Business Company has actually acquired more relied on by clients.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Spending as a portion of sales are declining with increasing actual quantity of costs reveals that the sales are increasing at a greater rate than its R&D costs, and permit the business to more spend on R&D.
Net Earnings Margin is increasing while R&D as a percentage of sales is decreasing. This sign likewise shows a green light to the R&D costs, mergers and acquisitions.
Debt ratio of the business is increasing due to its costs on mergers, acquisitions and R&D development instead of payment of financial obligations. This increasing financial obligation ratio pose a risk of default of Business to its financiers and could lead a declining share rates. In terms of increasing debt ratio, the company ought to not spend much on R&D and ought to pay its existing financial obligations to decrease the danger for investors.
The increasing risk of investors with increasing debt ratio and decreasing share costs can be observed by huge decline of EPS of Canary Wharf stocks.
The sales growth of business is also low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception building of customers. This slow development also hinder company to more spend on its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Keep in mind: All the above analysis is done on the basis of estimations and Charts given in the Exhibits D and E.

TWOS Analysis


TWOS analysis can be used to derive different techniques based upon the SWOT Analysis provided above. A short summary of TWOS Analysis is given in Exhibit H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business ought to introduce more ingenious products by big quantity of R&D Costs and mergers and acquisitions. It could increase the marketplace share of Business and increase the revenue margins for the company. It could also supply Business a long term competitive benefit over its competitors.
The worldwide growth of Business need to be concentrated on market capturing of establishing countries by expansion, attracting more clients through client's loyalty. As developing nations are more populous than industrialized nations, it might increase the consumer circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisCanary Wharf ought to do cautious acquisition and merger of organizations, as it could impact the consumer's and society's understandings about Business. It must obtain and combine with those companies which have a market reputation of healthy and nutritious companies. It would enhance the perceptions of customers about Business.
Business must not just spend its R&D on innovation, rather than it needs to likewise concentrate on the R&D costs over assessment of cost of various healthy items. This would increase expense performance of its items, which will result in increasing its sales, due to declining rates, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business should move to not just developing however also to developed nations. It needs to expands its geographical growth. This wide geographical growth towards establishing and established nations would minimize the threat of possible losses in times of instability in numerous nations. It needs to widen its circle to various nations like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus countries.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

It must acquire and merge with those countries having a goodwill of being a healthy company in the market. It would likewise make it possible for the business to utilize its prospective resources efficiently on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those companies slowing the NHW method development.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The demographic division of Business is based on four elements; age, gender, earnings and occupation. For instance, Business produces a number of products associated with infants i.e. Cerelac, Nido, etc. and related to grownups i.e. confectionary items. Canary Wharf items are quite cost effective by nearly all levels, but its significant targeted consumers, in regards to earnings level are middle and upper middle level customers.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical division of Business is made up of its presence in almost 86 nations. Its geographical division is based upon two primary elements i.e. typical earnings level of the customer along with the environment of the region. Singapore Business Business's segmentation is done on the basis of the weather condition of the area i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic segmentation of Business is based upon the personality and lifestyle of the consumer. For instance, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those clients whose life style is quite hectic and do not have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Canary Wharf behavioral segmentation is based upon the attitude knowledge and awareness of the customer. For example its extremely nutritious items target those customers who have a health conscious attitude towards their consumptions.

Canary Wharf Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand in the market and keep the consumer intact with the brand name, there are 2 choices:
Option: 1
The Business ought to spend more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase total properties of the business, increasing the wealth of the business. Spending on R&D would be sunk cost.
2. The company can resell the gotten systems in the market, if it fails to execute its method. Nevertheless, quantity invest in the R&D might not be restored, and it will be thought about totally sunk cost, if it do not give possible outcomes.
3. Investing in R&D offer sluggish development in sales, as it takes long time to introduce an item. However, acquisitions offer quick results, as it offer the company already developed item, which can be marketed not long after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of business's which do not fit with the company's values like Kraftz foods can lead the company to deal with misconception of customers about Business core worths of healthy and nutritious items.
2 Big costs on acquisitions than R&D would send a signal of company's inadequacy of developing ingenious items, and would results in consumer's frustration.
3. Big acquisitions than R&D would extend the line of product of the company by the items which are already present in the market, making company not able to introduce new ingenious items.
Option: 2.
The Company should spend more on its R&D rather than acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would make it possible for the company to produce more ingenious items.
2. It would offer the business a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would allow the company to increase its targeted consumers by introducing those items which can be provided to a totally new market section.
4. Ingenious items will provide long term advantages and high market share in long run.
Cons:
1. It would decrease the profit margins of the business.
2. In case of failure, the entire spending on R&D would be thought about as sunk expense, and would impact the company at big. The risk is not when it comes to acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of company, which could offer a negative signal to the financiers, and might result I decreasing stock rates.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with substantial costs on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would allow the company to introduce brand-new innovative products with less danger of converting the spending on R&D into sunk expense.
2. It would offer a favorable signal to the financiers, as the general assets of the company would increase with its substantial R&D spending.
3. It would not affect the earnings margins of the company at a large rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would offer the company a strong long term market position in regards to the business's overall wealth as well as in regards to ingenious products.
Cons:
1. Danger of conversion of R&D costs into sunk cost, higher than alternative 1 lower than alternative 2.
2. Risk of mistaken belief about the acquisitions, greater than alternative 2 and lesser than alternative 1.
3. Introduction of less number of ingenious products than alternative 2 and high number of ingenious items than alternative 1.

Canary Wharf Conclusion

RecommendationsBusiness has actually stayed the leading market player for more than a years. It has actually institutionalised its strategies and culture to align itself with the market modifications and customer habits, which has actually eventually allowed it to sustain its market share. Though, Business has actually developed substantial market share and brand name identity in the city markets, it is recommended that the company should focus on the rural areas in regards to establishing brand loyalty, awareness, and equity, such can be done by developing a specific brand name allocation technique through trade marketing methods, that draw clear distinction between Canary Wharf items and other rival products. Moreover, Business must leverage its brand name picture of safe and healthy food in catering the rural markets and also to upscale the offerings in other classifications such as nutrition. This will permit the business to establish brand equity for newly presented and already produced items on a higher platform, making the reliable usage of resources and brand name image in the market.

Canary Wharf Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental support

Altering requirements of global food.
Improved market share. Transforming assumption in the direction of much healthier products Improvements in R&D as well as QA divisions.

Intro of E-marketing.
No such effect as it is good. Concerns over recycling.

Use resources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Greatest because 9000 Highest after Organisation with much less growth than Company 9th Cheapest
R&D Spending Highest possible since 2005 Highest after Business 5th Most affordable
Net Profit Margin Highest since 2001 with rapid growth from 2004 to 2013 Because of sale of Alcon in 2013. Almost equal to Kraft Foods Consolidation Almost equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nourishment and also wellness factor Highest possible number of brand names with lasting practices Biggest confectionary and processed foods brand on the planet Biggest milk items as well as bottled water brand on the planet
Segmentation Center and also top middle level customers worldwide Specific consumers in addition to house group Any age and Income Customer Groups Middle as well as top middle degree customers worldwide
Number of Brands 6th 9th 2nd 7th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 84295 411137 798753 344627 887917
Net Profit Margin 9.93% 7.76% 85.17% 3.91% 12.37%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 64.63 8.85 1.35 8.48 28.94
Total Asset 458168 847455 952382 278317 89253
Total Debt 58245 77666 63185 92135 57168
Debt Ratio 94% 59% 94% 61% 79%
R&D Spending 5696 8543 4853 1738 2674
R&D Spending as % of Sales 4.16% 8.52% 9.91% 8.49% 2.39%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations