Menu

Origin Of Strategy Case Study Solution

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Darden >> Origin Of Strategy >>

Origin Of Strategy Case Study Analysis

Origin Of Strategy is presently among the greatest food chains worldwide. It was founded by Darden in 1866, a German Pharmacist who initially launched "FarineLactee"; a combination of flour and milk to feed infants and decrease mortality rate. At the same time, the Page siblings from Switzerland likewise found The Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company. The two ended up being rivals in the beginning however later merged in 1905, leading to the birth of Origin Of Strategy.
Business is now a multinational business. Unlike other multinational business, it has senior executives from different nations and tries to make decisions thinking about the entire world. Origin Of Strategy presently has more than 500 factories worldwide and a network spread across 86 nations.

Purpose

The purpose of Origin Of Strategy Corporation is to boost the quality of life of individuals by playing its part and supplying healthy food. It wishes to help the world in shaping a healthy and much better future for it. It likewise wishes to encourage individuals to live a healthy life. While making sure that the company is prospering in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a much better and healthy future

Vision

Origin Of Strategy's vision is to offer its consumers with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to eat. It wishes to be innovative and concurrently understand the needs and requirements of its consumers. Its vision is to grow fast and offer products that would satisfy the requirements of each age group. Origin Of Strategy pictures to develop a well-trained workforce which would help the company to grow
.

Mission

Origin Of Strategy's objective is that as presently, it is the leading company in the food market, it thinks in 'Great Food, Excellent Life". Its mission is to offer its consumers with a range of choices that are healthy and finest in taste too. It is focused on offering the very best food to its clients throughout the day and night.

Products.

Business has a wide range of products that it provides to its customers. Its items consist of food for babies, cereals, dairy items, snacks, chocolates, food for family pet and bottled water. It has around 4 hundred and fifty (450) factories around the world and around 328,000 staff members. In 2011, Business was listed as the most gainful organization.

Goals and Objectives

• Bearing in mind the vision and objective of the corporation, the company has actually put down its objectives and goals. These objectives and goals are noted below.
• One goal of the business is to reach zero garbage dump status. It is pursuing absolutely no waste, where no waste of the factory is landfilled. It encourages its employees to take the most out of the by-products. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another objective of Origin Of Strategy is to squander minimum food throughout production. Most often, the food produced is squandered even before it reaches the clients.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to enhance its packaging in such a way that it would help it to decrease the above-mentioned complications and would also guarantee the shipment of high quality of its items to its customers.
• Meet international requirements of the environment.
• Develop a relationship based on trust with its customers, service partners, employees, and government.

Critical Issues

Just Recently, Business Business is focusing more towards the strategy of NHW and investing more of its revenues on the R&D innovation. The country is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW method. The target of the business is not achieved as the sales were expected to grow higher at the rate of 10% per year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, provided in Exhibit H.

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The current Business strategy is based upon the principle of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This method handles the concept to bringing change in the customer preferences about food and making the food stuff healthier worrying about the health concerns.
The vision of this strategy is based upon the secret approach i.e. 60/40+ which simply indicates that the items will have a score of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based on its dietary worth. The products will be produced with extra nutritional worth in contrast to all other items in market gaining it a plus on its nutritional content.
This technique was embraced to bring more yummy plus healthy foods and beverages in market than ever. In competition with other business, with an intent of keeping its trust over customers as Business Company has actually gotten more trusted by costumers.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Costs as a portion of sales are declining with increasing actual amount of costs shows that the sales are increasing at a higher rate than its R&D costs, and allow the business to more invest in R&D.
Net Profit Margin is increasing while R&D as a percentage of sales is declining. This indicator also reveals a green light to the R&D costs, mergers and acquisitions.
Debt ratio of the company is increasing due to its costs on mergers, acquisitions and R&D advancement rather than payment of financial obligations. This increasing financial obligation ratio present a risk of default of Business to its investors and might lead a declining share rates. For that reason, in terms of increasing debt ratio, the company should not spend much on R&D and needs to pay its current financial obligations to reduce the risk for financiers.
The increasing risk of investors with increasing debt ratio and declining share prices can be observed by huge decrease of EPS of Origin Of Strategy stocks.
The sales growth of business is also low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception structure of customers. This sluggish development also prevent company to further spend on its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Keep in mind: All the above analysis is done on the basis of computations and Charts given up the Exhibitions D and E.

TWOS Analysis


2 analysis can be used to derive different methods based on the SWOT Analysis offered above. A brief summary of TWOS Analysis is given up Exhibition H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business needs to present more innovative products by big quantity of R&D Costs and mergers and acquisitions. It could increase the marketplace share of Business and increase the revenue margins for the company. It could also offer Business a long term competitive advantage over its competitors.
The worldwide expansion of Business should be concentrated on market capturing of establishing countries by growth, drawing in more clients through consumer's commitment. As establishing nations are more populated than developed nations, it might increase the consumer circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisOrigin Of Strategy ought to do mindful acquisition and merger of companies, as it could impact the consumer's and society's perceptions about Business. It ought to obtain and combine with those business which have a market track record of healthy and nutritious companies. It would enhance the understandings of customers about Business.
Business should not only invest its R&D on development, instead of it needs to also focus on the R&D spending over assessment of cost of different healthy items. This would increase expense efficiency of its items, which will lead to increasing its sales, due to declining prices, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business ought to move to not only developing but likewise to developed nations. It needs to broaden its circle to numerous countries like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus nations.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

It ought to acquire and combine with those nations having a goodwill of being a healthy business in the market. It would likewise make it possible for the business to use its prospective resources effectively on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those companies slowing the NHW method development.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The demographic segmentation of Business is based upon 4 factors; age, gender, earnings and profession. For instance, Business produces a number of items associated with babies i.e. Cerelac, Nido, etc. and related to grownups i.e. confectionary products. Origin Of Strategy items are rather budget friendly by practically all levels, but its significant targeted consumers, in regards to income level are middle and upper middle level customers.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical division of Business is composed of its existence in almost 86 countries. Its geographical segmentation is based upon two main aspects i.e. typical earnings level of the consumer as well as the climate of the area. Singapore Business Company's segmentation is done on the basis of the weather of the area i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic segmentation of Business is based upon the character and life style of the customer. Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those clients whose life design is quite hectic and don't have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Origin Of Strategy behavioral segmentation is based upon the mindset understanding and awareness of the customer. For instance its extremely healthy products target those clients who have a health mindful mindset towards their usages.

Origin Of Strategy Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand in the market and keep the customer intact with the brand, there are 2 choices:
Alternative: 1
The Business needs to spend more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase overall properties of the company, increasing the wealth of the company. Spending on R&D would be sunk expense.
2. The business can resell the acquired systems in the market, if it stops working to execute its strategy. However, amount invest in the R&D might not be revived, and it will be thought about completely sunk cost, if it do not offer possible outcomes.
3. Spending on R&D offer slow development in sales, as it takes long time to introduce a product. Acquisitions offer quick outcomes, as it provide the company already established product, which can be marketed quickly after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of business's which do not fit with the business's values like Kraftz foods can lead the company to face mistaken belief of consumers about Business core worths of healthy and nutritious items.
2 Large costs on acquisitions than R&D would send out a signal of business's inadequacy of establishing ingenious products, and would results in customer's discontentment.
3. Big acquisitions than R&D would extend the product line of the company by the items which are already present in the market, making business unable to present new ingenious products.
Alternative: 2.
The Business should spend more on its R&D rather than acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would allow the business to produce more ingenious products.
2. It would supply the company a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would make it possible for the business to increase its targeted clients by introducing those items which can be offered to an entirely new market sector.
4. Ingenious products will offer long term benefits and high market share in long term.
Cons:
1. It would reduce the revenue margins of the company.
2. In case of failure, the entire spending on R&D would be considered as sunk expense, and would impact the company at large. The danger is not when it comes to acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of company, which could provide a negative signal to the investors, and could result I decreasing stock rates.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with substantial spending on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would enable the company to introduce brand-new ingenious items with less danger of transforming the spending on R&D into sunk cost.
2. It would supply a favorable signal to the investors, as the overall possessions of the business would increase with its significant R&D costs.
3. It would not affect the revenue margins of the business at a large rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would supply the company a strong long term market position in terms of the company's overall wealth along with in regards to ingenious items.
Cons:
1. Risk of conversion of R&D spending into sunk cost, greater than alternative 1 lower than alternative 2.
2. Risk of misunderstanding about the acquisitions, greater than alternative 2 and lesser than alternative 1.
3. Introduction of less number of innovative items than alternative 2 and high number of ingenious products than alternative 1.

Origin Of Strategy Conclusion

RecommendationsIt has actually institutionalised its techniques and culture to align itself with the market changes and client behavior, which has actually ultimately enabled it to sustain its market share. Business has actually developed significant market share and brand identity in the metropolitan markets, it is advised that the company must focus on the rural locations in terms of establishing brand name loyalty, awareness, and equity, such can be done by producing a specific brand name allocation method through trade marketing strategies, that draw clear difference in between Origin Of Strategy products and other competitor products.

Origin Of Strategy Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental support

Transforming requirements of international food.
Boosted market share. Changing understanding towards much healthier products Improvements in R&D as well as QA divisions.

Intro of E-marketing.
No such effect as it is beneficial. Concerns over recycling.

Use of resources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Greatest since 3000 Highest after Service with less development than Service 7th Lowest
R&D Spending Greatest because 2007 Highest after Business 4th Cheapest
Net Profit Margin Highest because 2007 with fast development from 2002 to 2012 Because of sale of Alcon in 2019. Practically equal to Kraft Foods Consolidation Practically equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nourishment as well as health aspect Highest possible variety of brand names with lasting techniques Biggest confectionary and also refined foods brand name on the planet Biggest dairy products and also bottled water brand name on the planet
Segmentation Center and also upper middle degree customers worldwide Specific customers together with household team Every age and also Revenue Customer Teams Center and top middle level consumers worldwide
Number of Brands 8th 4th 5th 5th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 75818 743257 391872 566525 525889
Net Profit Margin 9.37% 2.68% 21.66% 1.66% 84.36%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 76.53 3.78 5.48 6.31 87.64
Total Asset 726278 517554 829572 536594 11726
Total Debt 74363 38657 21661 35844 51193
Debt Ratio 37% 79% 46% 95% 81%
R&D Spending 4253 6145 2998 5363 8757
R&D Spending as % of Sales 6.12% 7.57% 4.12% 5.87% 6.46%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations