Menu

Rockeford Inc Case Study Help

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Kelloggs >> Rockeford Inc >>

Rockeford Inc Case Study Analysis

Business is presently one of the biggest food chains worldwide. It was established by Henri Rockeford Inc in 1866, a German Pharmacist who initially launched "FarineLactee"; a mix of flour and milk to feed babies and decrease mortality rate.
Business is now a global company. Unlike other multinational business, it has senior executives from various nations and tries to make choices considering the entire world. Rockeford Inc presently has more than 500 factories worldwide and a network spread throughout 86 countries.

Purpose

The function of Business Corporation is to boost the quality of life of people by playing its part and offering healthy food. While making sure that the business is prospering in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a much better and healthy future

Vision

Rockeford Inc's vision is to offer its consumers with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to consume. Business visualizes to establish a well-trained workforce which would help the business to grow
.

Mission

Rockeford Inc's mission is that as presently, it is the leading company in the food industry, it thinks in 'Good Food, Good Life". Its mission is to supply its customers with a variety of options that are healthy and finest in taste also. It is concentrated on supplying the best food to its clients throughout the day and night.

Products.

Rockeford Inc has a wide variety of items that it provides to its clients. In 2011, Business was noted as the most rewarding organization.

Goals and Objectives

• Keeping in mind the vision and mission of the corporation, the company has laid down its goals and objectives. These goals and goals are noted below.
• One objective of the company is to reach absolutely no land fill status. It is working toward zero waste, where no waste of the factory is landfilled. It encourages its workers to take the most out of the by-products. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another objective of Rockeford Inc is to lose minimum food during production. Frequently, the food produced is lost even prior to it reaches the customers.
• Another thing that Business is working on is to enhance its packaging in such a method that it would help it to reduce the above-mentioned problems and would also ensure the delivery of high quality of its items to its clients.
• Meet worldwide standards of the environment.
• Develop a relationship based on trust with its consumers, company partners, staff members, and federal government.

Critical Issues

Recently, Business Company is focusing more towards the strategy of NHW and investing more of its revenues on the R&D innovation. The nation is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW method. The target of the business is not attained as the sales were anticipated to grow greater at the rate of 10% per year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given in Exhibit H.

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The present Business strategy is based on the concept of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This technique handles the idea to bringing modification in the consumer choices about food and making the food stuff healthier concerning about the health problems.
The vision of this strategy is based on the key approach i.e. 60/40+ which just implies that the products will have a score of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based upon its dietary value. The products will be produced with additional dietary worth in contrast to all other items in market acquiring it a plus on its dietary content.
This method was adopted to bring more yummy plus nutritious foods and drinks in market than ever. In competition with other business, with an intention of retaining its trust over customers as Business Business has gotten more relied on by customers.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Spending as a percentage of sales are declining with increasing real amount of spending shows that the sales are increasing at a greater rate than its R&D spending, and permit the company to more invest in R&D.
Net Earnings Margin is increasing while R&D as a percentage of sales is decreasing. This sign likewise shows a green light to the R&D spending, mergers and acquisitions.
Debt ratio of the company is increasing due to its spending on mergers, acquisitions and R&D advancement instead of payment of debts. This increasing debt ratio pose a hazard of default of Business to its investors and might lead a decreasing share rates. In terms of increasing debt ratio, the firm needs to not spend much on R&D and should pay its present debts to reduce the threat for investors.
The increasing risk of financiers with increasing financial obligation ratio and declining share prices can be observed by substantial decrease of EPS of Rockeford Inc stocks.
The sales growth of business is likewise low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow understanding structure of customers. This sluggish development likewise impede company to further spend on its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Keep in mind: All the above analysis is done on the basis of calculations and Charts given up the Displays D and E.

TWOS Analysis


2 analysis can be utilized to obtain various techniques based upon the SWOT Analysis provided above. A short summary of TWOS Analysis is given up Exhibit H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business ought to present more innovative items by big quantity of R&D Spending and mergers and acquisitions. It could increase the marketplace share of Business and increase the profit margins for the company. It could likewise offer Business a long term competitive benefit over its rivals.
The worldwide expansion of Business need to be concentrated on market recording of developing nations by growth, bring in more consumers through customer's commitment. As developing nations are more populated than developed countries, it might increase the client circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisRockeford Inc needs to do cautious acquisition and merger of organizations, as it could affect the client's and society's perceptions about Business. It needs to obtain and merge with those companies which have a market credibility of healthy and healthy companies. It would improve the understandings of customers about Business.
Business must not just spend its R&D on development, instead of it ought to also concentrate on the R&D spending over examination of expense of different healthy items. This would increase cost performance of its items, which will lead to increasing its sales, due to decreasing prices, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business should move to not just establishing however likewise to industrialized nations. It needs to expand its circle to different nations like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus nations.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

Rockeford Inc needs to sensibly control its acquisitions to avoid the danger of mistaken belief from the customers about Business. It ought to get and merge with those nations having a goodwill of being a healthy business in the market. This would not just improve the perception of customers about Business but would likewise increase the sales, earnings margins and market share of Business. It would likewise enable the business to use its potential resources effectively on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those companies slowing the NHW technique development.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The group segmentation of Business is based upon 4 aspects; age, gender, earnings and profession. For instance, Business produces a number of items connected to children i.e. Cerelac, Nido, etc. and associated to grownups i.e. confectionary products. Rockeford Inc items are rather inexpensive by practically all levels, but its significant targeted customers, in terms of income level are middle and upper middle level clients.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical segmentation of Business is made up of its presence in nearly 86 nations. Its geographical division is based upon two main factors i.e. average income level of the consumer in addition to the environment of the area. For instance, Singapore Business Business's segmentation is done on the basis of the weather of the region i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic segmentation of Business is based upon the personality and life style of the client. For example, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those consumers whose life style is rather busy and don't have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Rockeford Inc behavioral segmentation is based upon the mindset knowledge and awareness of the customer. Its highly nutritious products target those customers who have a health conscious attitude towards their intakes.

Rockeford Inc Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand name in the market and keep the consumer intact with the brand, there are two choices:
Option: 1
The Company ought to spend more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase total assets of the company, increasing the wealth of the business. However, spending on R&D would be sunk expense.
2. The company can resell the obtained units in the market, if it fails to implement its technique. However, amount spend on the R&D could not be revived, and it will be thought about completely sunk expense, if it do not provide possible outcomes.
3. Investing in R&D supply slow growth in sales, as it takes long period of time to introduce a product. Acquisitions supply fast outcomes, as it supply the company already developed product, which can be marketed quickly after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of business's which do not fit with the company's values like Kraftz foods can lead the business to face misunderstanding of consumers about Business core worths of healthy and healthy products.
2 Large spending on acquisitions than R&D would send out a signal of company's inefficiency of developing ingenious items, and would results in customer's frustration.
3. Big acquisitions than R&D would extend the line of product of the business by the items which are currently present in the market, making company unable to present new innovative products.
Alternative: 2.
The Business ought to spend more on its R&D instead of acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would enable the business to produce more innovative products.
2. It would offer the company a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would allow the company to increase its targeted customers by introducing those products which can be offered to a completely new market sector.
4. Ingenious products will supply long term advantages and high market share in long run.
Cons:
1. It would reduce the earnings margins of the business.
2. In case of failure, the entire spending on R&D would be thought about as sunk cost, and would affect the company at big. The threat is not in the case of acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of company, which could supply a negative signal to the investors, and could result I decreasing stock rates.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with significant spending on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would allow the business to present brand-new innovative products with less threat of converting the costs on R&D into sunk expense.
2. It would provide a favorable signal to the investors, as the total assets of the business would increase with its substantial R&D spending.
3. It would not affect the revenue margins of the business at a large rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would offer the company a strong long term market position in terms of the business's general wealth along with in regards to ingenious items.
Cons:
1. Danger of conversion of R&D costs into sunk expense, higher than option 1 lower than alternative 2.
2. Threat of misconception about the acquisitions, higher than alternative 2 and lower than option 1.
3. Introduction of less variety of innovative items than alternative 2 and high number of innovative items than alternative 1.

Rockeford Inc Conclusion

RecommendationsIt has actually institutionalised its methods and culture to align itself with the market modifications and client habits, which has eventually allowed it to sustain its market share. Business has actually developed significant market share and brand identity in the metropolitan markets, it is suggested that the company must focus on the rural locations in terms of establishing brand name loyalty, awareness, and equity, such can be done by developing a specific brand name allotment strategy through trade marketing methods, that draw clear difference between Rockeford Inc items and other rival products.

Rockeford Inc Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental assistance

Changing criteria of international food.
Improved market share. Transforming perception in the direction of healthier items Improvements in R&D as well as QA divisions.

Introduction of E-marketing.
No such influence as it is good. Problems over recycling.

Use of resources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Highest since 9000 Highest possible after Service with much less growth than Company 8th Cheapest
R&D Spending Highest possible considering that 2007 Greatest after Service 3rd Least expensive
Net Profit Margin Highest because 2008 with fast development from 2004 to 2014 As a result of sale of Alcon in 2012. Almost equal to Kraft Foods Consolidation Practically equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nourishment and also wellness variable Highest possible variety of brand names with lasting techniques Biggest confectionary as well as processed foods brand name worldwide Biggest dairy products as well as bottled water brand in the world
Segmentation Center and also top center degree consumers worldwide Individual clients along with family group Every age and Earnings Client Groups Middle and top center level consumers worldwide
Number of Brands 1st 8th 4th 4th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 17269 577261 166825 212495 745537
Net Profit Margin 7.47% 7.53% 12.92% 8.82% 34.64%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 17.77 2.37 5.89 6.45 84.53
Total Asset 855228 731217 178584 991896 31571
Total Debt 14153 96759 88148 85596 35247
Debt Ratio 85% 93% 74% 99% 74%
R&D Spending 3567 2448 5324 2954 1385
R&D Spending as % of Sales 4.22% 3.72% 2.95% 4.69% 7.45%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations