Menu

Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc Case Study Solution

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Harvard >> Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc >>

Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc Case Study Analysis

Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc is currently among the greatest food cycle worldwide. It was established by Harvard in 1866, a German Pharmacist who initially released "FarineLactee"; a combination of flour and milk to feed infants and reduce mortality rate. At the exact same time, the Page siblings from Switzerland likewise found The Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Business. The 2 ended up being rivals at first but in the future merged in 1905, leading to the birth of Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc.
Business is now a global business. Unlike other multinational companies, it has senior executives from different nations and attempts to make decisions considering the entire world. Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc presently has more than 500 factories around the world and a network spread throughout 86 nations.

Purpose

The function of Business Corporation is to boost the quality of life of individuals by playing its part and supplying healthy food. While making sure that the company is being successful in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a much better and healthy future

Vision

Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc's vision is to offer its customers with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to eat. It wishes to be innovative and at the same time comprehend the needs and requirements of its consumers. Its vision is to grow quickly and provide products that would satisfy the requirements of each age group. Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc visualizes to develop a trained workforce which would help the company to grow
.

Mission

Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc's mission is that as currently, it is the leading company in the food market, it believes in 'Great Food, Great Life". Its objective is to supply its consumers with a range of options that are healthy and finest in taste. It is concentrated on offering the best food to its consumers throughout the day and night.

Products.

Business has a wide variety of products that it uses to its clients. Its items include food for babies, cereals, dairy items, treats, chocolates, food for pet and mineral water. It has around four hundred and fifty (450) factories around the world and around 328,000 staff members. In 2011, Business was noted as the most gainful company.

Goals and Objectives

• Keeping in mind the vision and objective of the corporation, the company has set its goals and goals. These objectives and goals are noted below.
• One goal of the company is to reach zero landfill status. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another goal of Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc is to lose minimum food throughout production. Most often, the food produced is wasted even prior to it reaches the consumers.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to improve its packaging in such a method that it would help it to lower the above-mentioned problems and would likewise guarantee the delivery of high quality of its items to its customers.
• Meet international standards of the environment.
• Build a relationship based on trust with its customers, company partners, workers, and government.

Critical Issues

Recently, Business Business is focusing more towards the strategy of NHW and investing more of its profits on the R&D innovation. The country is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW technique. The target of the business is not achieved as the sales were expected to grow higher at the rate of 10% per year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given in Exhibit H.

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The current Business technique is based upon the idea of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This method deals with the idea to bringing change in the customer preferences about food and making the food stuff healthier concerning about the health issues.
The vision of this strategy is based upon the secret approach i.e. 60/40+ which merely suggests that the items will have a score of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based upon its dietary worth. The items will be produced with additional nutritional worth in contrast to all other products in market acquiring it a plus on its nutritional content.
This method was embraced to bring more yummy plus nutritious foods and beverages in market than ever. In competition with other companies, with an objective of maintaining its trust over consumers as Business Business has acquired more trusted by clients.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Costs as a percentage of sales are declining with increasing actual amount of spending reveals that the sales are increasing at a higher rate than its R&D spending, and enable the company to more invest in R&D.
Net Revenue Margin is increasing while R&D as a portion of sales is declining. This indication likewise shows a green light to the R&D spending, mergers and acquisitions.
Financial obligation ratio of the business is increasing due to its spending on mergers, acquisitions and R&D advancement rather than payment of financial obligations. This increasing debt ratio posture a risk of default of Business to its investors and might lead a declining share costs. In terms of increasing debt ratio, the firm should not invest much on R&D and needs to pay its present debts to decrease the threat for investors.
The increasing danger of investors with increasing financial obligation ratio and declining share rates can be observed by huge decrease of EPS of Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc stocks.
The sales development of company is likewise low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception building of consumers. This slow growth likewise prevent business to additional invest in its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Note: All the above analysis is done on the basis of computations and Charts given in the Exhibitions D and E.

TWOS Analysis


2 analysis can be utilized to derive numerous methods based on the SWOT Analysis offered above. A short summary of TWOS Analysis is given in Exhibit H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business ought to introduce more innovative items by big amount of R&D Costs and mergers and acquisitions. It might increase the marketplace share of Business and increase the profit margins for the business. It might likewise provide Business a long term competitive advantage over its rivals.
The global expansion of Business must be concentrated on market catching of establishing nations by growth, bring in more consumers through client's loyalty. As establishing nations are more populous than developed countries, it could increase the client circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisTerm Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc should do careful acquisition and merger of organizations, as it could affect the client's and society's understandings about Business. It should get and combine with those companies which have a market track record of healthy and nutritious business. It would improve the understandings of customers about Business.
Business should not just spend its R&D on development, instead of it needs to also concentrate on the R&D costs over examination of cost of different nutritious products. This would increase cost performance of its products, which will result in increasing its sales, due to decreasing costs, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business should move to not just developing however also to industrialized countries. It needs to broaden its circle to different countries like Unilever which runs in about 170 plus nations.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc ought to wisely control its acquisitions to prevent the threat of misunderstanding from the consumers about Business. It needs to get and combine with those countries having a goodwill of being a healthy company in the market. This would not only improve the perception of consumers about Business however would likewise increase the sales, revenue margins and market share of Business. It would likewise allow the business to utilize its prospective resources efficiently on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those companies slowing the NHW method development.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The demographic division of Business is based upon 4 factors; age, gender, income and occupation. For instance, Business produces a number of items related to children i.e. Cerelac, Nido, and so on and related to adults i.e. confectionary products. Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc items are rather inexpensive by nearly all levels, but its significant targeted clients, in terms of earnings level are middle and upper middle level consumers.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical segmentation of Business is made up of its existence in nearly 86 nations. Its geographical division is based upon two primary factors i.e. average income level of the customer along with the climate of the area. For example, Singapore Business Company's division is done on the basis of the weather condition of the area i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic segmentation of Business is based upon the personality and lifestyle of the client. For instance, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those clients whose lifestyle is quite busy and don't have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc behavioral division is based upon the mindset understanding and awareness of the consumer. For instance its extremely nutritious products target those clients who have a health conscious attitude towards their intakes.

Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand in the market and keep the consumer undamaged with the brand, there are two choices:
Alternative: 1
The Business should spend more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase overall properties of the business, increasing the wealth of the business. However, costs on R&D would be sunk expense.
2. The business can resell the gotten units in the market, if it stops working to implement its method. Amount invest on the R&D could not be restored, and it will be thought about totally sunk cost, if it do not give potential results.
3. Spending on R&D supply slow growth in sales, as it takes very long time to introduce an item. However, acquisitions offer fast results, as it offer the business already established product, which can be marketed not long after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of business's which do not fit with the company's values like Kraftz foods can lead the company to deal with mistaken belief of customers about Business core worths of healthy and healthy products.
2 Big costs on acquisitions than R&D would send a signal of business's inefficiency of establishing ingenious products, and would results in consumer's frustration as well.
3. Big acquisitions than R&D would extend the product line of the company by the items which are already present in the market, making company not able to introduce brand-new ingenious products.
Alternative: 2.
The Company must spend more on its R&D instead of acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would allow the business to produce more ingenious items.
2. It would offer the company a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would enable the company to increase its targeted clients by presenting those items which can be provided to an entirely new market segment.
4. Innovative products will supply long term benefits and high market share in long run.
Cons:
1. It would reduce the earnings margins of the business.
2. In case of failure, the entire costs on R&D would be thought about as sunk expense, and would impact the company at big. The danger is not in the case of acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of company, which might supply a negative signal to the investors, and might result I decreasing stock costs.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with significant spending on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would allow the company to introduce new ingenious products with less danger of converting the costs on R&D into sunk cost.
2. It would provide a favorable signal to the financiers, as the overall properties of the company would increase with its significant R&D costs.
3. It would not impact the revenue margins of the company at a large rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would provide the business a strong long term market position in terms of the company's overall wealth as well as in terms of innovative items.
Cons:
1. Danger of conversion of R&D costs into sunk cost, higher than option 1 lesser than alternative 2.
2. Danger of misconception about the acquisitions, greater than alternative 2 and lower than option 1.
3. Intro of less variety of ingenious items than alternative 2 and high variety of ingenious products than alternative 1.

Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc Conclusion

RecommendationsBusiness has actually remained the top market player for more than a decade. It has actually institutionalised its methods and culture to align itself with the market modifications and customer behavior, which has actually ultimately permitted it to sustain its market share. Business has actually developed substantial market share and brand name identity in the metropolitan markets, it is advised that the company must focus on the rural areas in terms of establishing brand commitment, awareness, and equity, such can be done by producing a specific brand name allotment strategy through trade marketing techniques, that draw clear distinction between Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc products and other competitor products. Moreover, Business ought to take advantage of its brand image of safe and healthy food in catering the rural markets and likewise to upscale the offerings in other categories such as nutrition. This will permit the business to develop brand equity for recently introduced and already produced items on a higher platform, making the effective usage of resources and brand image in the market.

Term Sheet Negotiations For Trendsetter Inc Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental support

Changing requirements of international food.
Enhanced market share. Changing perception towards much healthier products Improvements in R&D as well as QA departments.

Intro of E-marketing.
No such effect as it is favourable. Issues over recycling.

Use sources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Highest since 9000 Greatest after Company with much less growth than Organisation 2nd Cheapest
R&D Spending Highest possible since 2009 Highest possible after Company 1st Least expensive
Net Profit Margin Highest because 2001 with quick development from 2001 to 2013 Because of sale of Alcon in 2016. Nearly equal to Kraft Foods Incorporation Nearly equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nutrition and also wellness factor Highest variety of brand names with lasting methods Biggest confectionary and also processed foods brand name worldwide Largest dairy items and also mineral water brand in the world
Segmentation Center and top middle level customers worldwide Individual clients along with family group All age and also Earnings Consumer Teams Center and upper center level customers worldwide
Number of Brands 7th 9th 8th 1st

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 38275 866534 336711 292687 274323
Net Profit Margin 4.45% 1.85% 11.45% 5.73% 21.18%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 12.51 1.91 4.42 8.69 51.78
Total Asset 328649 159199 285554 216172 71693
Total Debt 45844 51274 21332 27682 39132
Debt Ratio 42% 69% 94% 74% 45%
R&D Spending 6532 4915 4853 5822 5282
R&D Spending as % of Sales 5.97% 5.38% 7.47% 7.44% 9.89%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations