Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Case Study Analysis

Case Study Solution And Analysis

Home >> Harvard >> Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries >>

Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Case Study Analysis

Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries is presently among the biggest food cycle worldwide. It was established by Harvard in 1866, a German Pharmacist who initially released "FarineLactee"; a mix of flour and milk to feed babies and reduce death rate. At the very same time, the Page siblings from Switzerland also found The Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company. The 2 became rivals initially however in the future combined in 1905, resulting in the birth of Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries.
Business is now a transnational company. Unlike other international business, it has senior executives from various countries and tries to make choices thinking about the whole world. Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries presently has more than 500 factories around the world and a network spread across 86 nations.


The purpose of Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Corporation is to boost the quality of life of individuals by playing its part and offering healthy food. It wishes to help the world in shaping a healthy and better future for it. It also wants to motivate people to live a healthy life. While making certain that the business is being successful in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a better and healthy future


Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries's vision is to supply its clients with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to consume. It wishes to be ingenious and concurrently comprehend the requirements and requirements of its consumers. Its vision is to grow quickly and supply items that would satisfy the needs of each age group. Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries pictures to establish a trained labor force which would help the company to grow


Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries's objective is that as presently, it is the leading business in the food industry, it thinks in 'Good Food, Great Life". Its mission is to provide its customers with a range of options that are healthy and finest in taste also. It is concentrated on providing the best food to its consumers throughout the day and night.


Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries has a broad range of items that it uses to its customers. In 2011, Business was noted as the most rewarding organization.

Goals and Objectives

• Remembering the vision and mission of the corporation, the business has laid down its objectives and goals. These objectives and goals are listed below.
• One objective of the business is to reach zero land fill status. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another objective of Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries is to waste minimum food throughout production. Usually, the food produced is squandered even before it reaches the clients.
• Another thing that Business is working on is to improve its product packaging in such a way that it would help it to minimize those problems and would likewise guarantee the delivery of high quality of its items to its clients.
• Meet international standards of the environment.
• Construct a relationship based upon trust with its customers, business partners, staff members, and government.

Critical Issues

Recently, Business Company is focusing more towards the method of NHW and investing more of its profits on the R&D innovation. The country is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW method. The target of the company is not accomplished as the sales were anticipated to grow higher at the rate of 10% per year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, provided in Display H.

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The existing Business technique is based upon the concept of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This method handles the concept to bringing modification in the client preferences about food and making the food things much healthier worrying about the health problems.
The vision of this method is based upon the secret approach i.e. 60/40+ which merely suggests that the products will have a rating of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based on its dietary worth. The products will be made with extra nutritional worth in contrast to all other items in market gaining it a plus on its dietary content.
This strategy was embraced to bring more yummy plus healthy foods and drinks in market than ever. In competitors with other business, with an objective of retaining its trust over customers as Business Company has gotten more trusted by clients.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Costs as a portion of sales are declining with increasing real quantity of costs reveals that the sales are increasing at a higher rate than its R&D costs, and permit the business to more spend on R&D.
Net Revenue Margin is increasing while R&D as a portion of sales is decreasing. This indication also shows a thumbs-up to the R&D costs, mergers and acquisitions.
Debt ratio of the business is increasing due to its spending on mergers, acquisitions and R&D advancement rather than payment of financial obligations. This increasing debt ratio posture a risk of default of Business to its investors and might lead a declining share costs. In terms of increasing debt ratio, the company needs to not spend much on R&D and ought to pay its current financial obligations to reduce the threat for financiers.
The increasing risk of financiers with increasing debt ratio and declining share rates can be observed by huge decline of EPS of Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries stocks.
The sales growth of company is also low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception structure of customers. This sluggish development likewise impede business to further invest in its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Keep in mind: All the above analysis is done on the basis of estimations and Graphs given in the Displays D and E.

TWOS Analysis

TWOS analysis can be used to obtain various techniques based on the SWOT Analysis provided above. A quick summary of TWOS Analysis is given in Exhibit H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business must introduce more innovative items by large quantity of R&D Spending and mergers and acquisitions. It could increase the marketplace share of Business and increase the profit margins for the business. It could also provide Business a long term competitive benefit over its competitors.
The international growth of Business should be concentrated on market catching of establishing nations by growth, bring in more customers through customer's loyalty. As developing nations are more populated than industrialized countries, it might increase the customer circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisInterexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries must do careful acquisition and merger of companies, as it might affect the consumer's and society's understandings about Business. It must obtain and combine with those companies which have a market credibility of healthy and nutritious business. It would improve the understandings of consumers about Business.
Business needs to not just spend its R&D on innovation, rather than it needs to likewise focus on the R&D costs over examination of cost of different healthy products. This would increase expense performance of its products, which will lead to increasing its sales, due to decreasing prices, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business should move to not just establishing however likewise to developed countries. It should widen its circle to various countries like Unilever which runs in about 170 plus countries.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries ought to carefully control its acquisitions to avoid the danger of mistaken belief from the customers about Business. It should acquire and combine with those nations having a goodwill of being a healthy company in the market. This would not just improve the perception of consumers about Business however would also increase the sales, earnings margins and market share of Business. It would also make it possible for the business to utilize its prospective resources efficiently on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those organizations slowing the NHW strategy growth.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The demographic segmentation of Business is based upon 4 factors; age, gender, earnings and occupation. Business produces several products related to children i.e. Cerelac, Nido, etc. and related to adults i.e. confectionary products. Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries items are rather budget friendly by nearly all levels, but its major targeted customers, in terms of earnings level are middle and upper middle level customers.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical segmentation of Business is composed of its presence in nearly 86 nations. Its geographical division is based upon two main factors i.e. typical earnings level of the consumer along with the environment of the region. Singapore Business Company's segmentation is done on the basis of the weather condition of the area i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic division of Business is based upon the character and lifestyle of the customer. For instance, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those clients whose life style is rather hectic and do not have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries behavioral division is based upon the mindset understanding and awareness of the consumer. For example its highly healthy products target those customers who have a health conscious mindset towards their intakes.

Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand in the market and keep the client undamaged with the brand name, there are two choices:
Alternative: 1
The Business ought to invest more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
1. Acquisitions would increase total possessions of the company, increasing the wealth of the business. Nevertheless, costs on R&D would be sunk expense.
2. The business can resell the acquired units in the market, if it fails to execute its strategy. Amount invest on the R&D could not be restored, and it will be considered entirely sunk expense, if it do not give possible results.
3. Spending on R&D supply slow growth in sales, as it takes long period of time to introduce a product. However, acquisitions offer quick outcomes, as it provide the company currently developed product, which can be marketed not long after the acquisition.
1. Acquisition of company's which do not fit with the company's values like Kraftz foods can lead the company to face misconception of consumers about Business core worths of healthy and healthy products.
2 Large spending on acquisitions than R&D would send a signal of business's inadequacy of developing innovative products, and would outcomes in customer's discontentment.
3. Large acquisitions than R&D would extend the product line of the company by the items which are already present in the market, making company not able to present brand-new innovative products.
Option: 2.
The Company ought to spend more on its R&D instead of acquisitions.
1. It would make it possible for the business to produce more ingenious products.
2. It would offer the company a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would enable the business to increase its targeted customers by introducing those products which can be provided to a completely new market segment.
4. Innovative items will provide long term advantages and high market share in long term.
1. It would reduce the revenue margins of the business.
2. In case of failure, the whole spending on R&D would be considered as sunk cost, and would affect the business at large. The risk is not when it comes to acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of business, which could offer a negative signal to the financiers, and could result I declining stock rates.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with substantial spending on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would permit the business to introduce new ingenious items with less danger of transforming the spending on R&D into sunk cost.
2. It would supply a favorable signal to the financiers, as the total possessions of the business would increase with its substantial R&D spending.
3. It would not affect the earnings margins of the business at a large rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would supply the business a strong long term market position in regards to the business's total wealth in addition to in terms of ingenious items.
1. Danger of conversion of R&D costs into sunk cost, higher than option 1 lesser than alternative 2.
2. Risk of mistaken belief about the acquisitions, higher than alternative 2 and lesser than alternative 1.
3. Introduction of less number of innovative products than alternative 2 and high number of ingenious products than alternative 1.

Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Conclusion

RecommendationsIt has institutionalized its techniques and culture to align itself with the market modifications and consumer behavior, which has actually eventually permitted it to sustain its market share. Business has actually established significant market share and brand identity in the urban markets, it is advised that the business ought to focus on the rural areas in terms of developing brand loyalty, awareness, and equity, such can be done by developing a specific brand allocation strategy through trade marketing tactics, that draw clear difference in between Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries products and other rival products.

Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
Governmental support

Transforming criteria of global food.
Improved market share.
Transforming perception in the direction of healthier items
Improvements in R&D and also QA departments.

Introduction of E-marketing.
No such impact as it is good.
Problems over recycling.

Use sources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Greatest given that 4000
Highest after Company with less development than Organisation 2nd Cheapest
R&D Spending Highest since 2001 Highest possible after Service 2nd Cheapest
Net Profit Margin Greatest because 2008 with rapid development from 2007 to 2015 Due to sale of Alcon in 2018. Practically equal to Kraft Foods Unification Virtually equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nutrition and health aspect Greatest variety of brand names with lasting techniques Biggest confectionary and also refined foods brand name in the world Biggest milk products and mineral water brand on the planet
Segmentation Middle and also upper center level customers worldwide Private consumers together with home team Every age as well as Earnings Customer Teams Middle as well as upper center degree consumers worldwide
Number of Brands 5th 5th 6th 8th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 98976 636661 597876 953448 281799
Net Profit Margin 3.59% 1.66% 94.62% 1.72% 14.59%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 63.16 4.62 3.75 2.17 23.54
Total Asset 746835 551347 183854 333129 39918
Total Debt 18838 12952 49589 54346 54517
Debt Ratio 59% 23% 95% 23% 45%
R&D Spending 4668 4934 5274 7984 7322
R&D Spending as % of Sales 1.45% 6.45% 3.33% 4.11% 1.61%

Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Executive Summary Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Swot Analysis Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Vrio Analysis Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Pestel Analysis
Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Porters Analysis Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Recommendations