Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Case Study Help

Case Study Solution And Analysis

Home >> Harvard >> Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries >>

Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Case Study Solution

Business is presently one of the most significant food chains worldwide. It was established by Henri Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries in 1866, a German Pharmacist who first introduced "FarineLactee"; a combination of flour and milk to feed infants and reduce mortality rate.
Business is now a multinational business. Unlike other multinational business, it has senior executives from various countries and tries to make decisions considering the entire world. Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries presently has more than 500 factories around the world and a network spread throughout 86 countries.


The purpose of Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Corporation is to improve the quality of life of individuals by playing its part and providing healthy food. It wants to help the world in shaping a healthy and better future for it. It likewise wishes to motivate people to live a healthy life. While ensuring that the business is prospering in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a much better and healthy future


Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries's vision is to supply its customers with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to consume. It wants to be innovative and all at once understand the requirements and requirements of its consumers. Its vision is to grow quick and supply products that would please the requirements of each age group. Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries envisions to develop a well-trained workforce which would help the company to grow


Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries's objective is that as currently, it is the leading company in the food market, it believes in 'Good Food, Excellent Life". Its mission is to provide its consumers with a variety of options that are healthy and finest in taste also. It is focused on offering the best food to its consumers throughout the day and night.


Business has a vast array of items that it provides to its customers. Its items consist of food for babies, cereals, dairy items, snacks, chocolates, food for animal and bottled water. It has around four hundred and fifty (450) factories around the world and around 328,000 employees. In 2011, Business was listed as the most rewarding organization.

Goals and Objectives

• Remembering the vision and objective of the corporation, the business has actually set its goals and objectives. These objectives and objectives are noted below.
• One goal of the business is to reach no land fill status. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another objective of Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries is to waste minimum food during production. Usually, the food produced is lost even before it reaches the customers.
• Another thing that Business is working on is to enhance its packaging in such a way that it would help it to minimize those problems and would also guarantee the shipment of high quality of its items to its customers.
• Meet international standards of the environment.
• Build a relationship based upon trust with its consumers, service partners, employees, and government.

Critical Issues

Recently, Business Business is focusing more towards the technique of NHW and investing more of its revenues on the R&D innovation. The country is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW strategy. Nevertheless, the target of the business is not attained as the sales were anticipated to grow higher at the rate of 10% each year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given in Exhibit H. There is a need to focus more on the sales then the development technology. Otherwise, it may result in the decreased revenue rate. (Henderson, 2012).

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The existing Business strategy is based on the concept of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This strategy handles the concept to bringing modification in the consumer choices about food and making the food stuff much healthier worrying about the health concerns.
The vision of this strategy is based upon the key method i.e. 60/40+ which simply means that the products will have a score of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based upon its dietary value. The products will be manufactured with extra nutritional worth in contrast to all other items in market gaining it a plus on its nutritional material.
This method was adopted to bring more tasty plus healthy foods and drinks in market than ever. In competition with other companies, with an objective of maintaining its trust over customers as Business Business has gained more trusted by clients.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Spending as a percentage of sales are decreasing with increasing actual amount of costs shows that the sales are increasing at a greater rate than its R&D costs, and allow the business to more spend on R&D.
Net Earnings Margin is increasing while R&D as a portion of sales is declining. This sign also reveals a green light to the R&D spending, mergers and acquisitions.
Debt ratio of the business is increasing due to its spending on mergers, acquisitions and R&D development instead of payment of financial obligations. This increasing debt ratio posture a danger of default of Business to its financiers and could lead a declining share costs. In terms of increasing financial obligation ratio, the company needs to not invest much on R&D and must pay its present financial obligations to reduce the danger for financiers.
The increasing risk of financiers with increasing debt ratio and decreasing share rates can be observed by huge decrease of EPS of Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries stocks.
The sales development of business is also low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception building of customers. This sluggish growth likewise hinder business to more invest in its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Note: All the above analysis is done on the basis of computations and Charts given in the Exhibits D and E.

TWOS Analysis

TWOS analysis can be utilized to obtain different strategies based on the SWOT Analysis offered above. A short summary of TWOS Analysis is given in Exhibit H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business must present more innovative products by large quantity of R&D Spending and mergers and acquisitions. It could increase the marketplace share of Business and increase the profit margins for the company. It might also provide Business a long term competitive benefit over its competitors.
The international growth of Business should be focused on market capturing of establishing nations by expansion, drawing in more customers through consumer's loyalty. As establishing countries are more populous than developed nations, it could increase the customer circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisInterexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries needs to do careful acquisition and merger of companies, as it might affect the client's and society's understandings about Business. It ought to obtain and merge with those companies which have a market reputation of healthy and nutritious companies. It would improve the perceptions of consumers about Business.
Business needs to not just invest its R&D on development, rather than it needs to also concentrate on the R&D costs over examination of expense of different healthy products. This would increase expense effectiveness of its products, which will result in increasing its sales, due to decreasing rates, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business must transfer to not just establishing but also to industrialized nations. It should expands its geographical growth. This large geographical growth towards establishing and developed nations would reduce the threat of possible losses in times of instability in different nations. It ought to broaden its circle to different countries like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus nations.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

It ought to get and merge with those countries having a goodwill of being a healthy company in the market. It would also make it possible for the company to use its potential resources efficiently on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those companies slowing the NHW technique development.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The market division of Business is based upon four elements; age, gender, earnings and occupation. Business produces numerous items related to children i.e. Cerelac, Nido, etc. and associated to adults i.e. confectionary products. Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries items are rather budget-friendly by nearly all levels, however its major targeted customers, in regards to income level are middle and upper middle level customers.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical division of Business is composed of its existence in practically 86 countries. Its geographical division is based upon two main elements i.e. typical income level of the customer as well as the environment of the region. Singapore Business Business's segmentation is done on the basis of the weather of the area i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic segmentation of Business is based upon the personality and lifestyle of the consumer. For example, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those consumers whose lifestyle is quite busy and do not have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries behavioral division is based upon the mindset understanding and awareness of the consumer. For example its highly healthy items target those customers who have a health conscious attitude towards their intakes.

Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand name in the market and keep the consumer undamaged with the brand name, there are two choices:
Option: 1
The Business needs to invest more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
1. Acquisitions would increase overall possessions of the company, increasing the wealth of the company. Costs on R&D would be sunk cost.
2. The business can resell the gotten units in the market, if it stops working to execute its technique. However, quantity invest in the R&D might not be restored, and it will be considered completely sunk cost, if it do not offer potential outcomes.
3. Spending on R&D provide slow growth in sales, as it takes long time to introduce an item. However, acquisitions provide fast outcomes, as it offer the business already established product, which can be marketed not long after the acquisition.
1. Acquisition of company's which do not fit with the business's worths like Kraftz foods can lead the company to face misconception of consumers about Business core worths of healthy and nutritious items.
2 Big spending on acquisitions than R&D would send a signal of company's inefficiency of establishing ingenious products, and would lead to customer's frustration as well.
3. Large acquisitions than R&D would extend the product line of the company by the products which are already present in the market, making business unable to introduce new innovative products.
Alternative: 2.
The Business must invest more on its R&D instead of acquisitions.
1. It would enable the business to produce more ingenious products.
2. It would provide the business a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would make it possible for the business to increase its targeted customers by presenting those items which can be provided to an entirely new market section.
4. Innovative items will provide long term advantages and high market share in long term.
1. It would decrease the revenue margins of the company.
2. In case of failure, the entire spending on R&D would be thought about as sunk cost, and would impact the company at large. The threat is not in the case of acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of company, which could supply an unfavorable signal to the investors, and could result I decreasing stock rates.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with significant costs on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would allow the business to introduce brand-new innovative items with less threat of transforming the costs on R&D into sunk expense.
2. It would supply a positive signal to the investors, as the overall assets of the business would increase with its significant R&D spending.
3. It would not affect the profit margins of the business at a big rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would offer the business a strong long term market position in terms of the company's total wealth in addition to in terms of innovative items.
1. Threat of conversion of R&D spending into sunk expense, higher than option 1 lower than alternative 2.
2. Threat of misconception about the acquisitions, higher than alternative 2 and lower than option 1.
3. Introduction of less number of ingenious items than alternative 2 and high number of ingenious items than alternative 1.

Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Conclusion

RecommendationsBusiness has actually remained the leading market player for more than a decade. It has institutionalized its strategies and culture to align itself with the marketplace changes and consumer behavior, which has actually ultimately enabled it to sustain its market share. Business has actually established considerable market share and brand identity in the urban markets, it is suggested that the company needs to focus on the rural areas in terms of developing brand loyalty, awareness, and equity, such can be done by producing a specific brand allocation strategy through trade marketing techniques, that draw clear distinction in between Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries products and other competitor items. Additionally, Business should take advantage of its brand picture of safe and healthy food in catering the rural markets and also to upscale the offerings in other categories such as nutrition. This will enable the company to establish brand name equity for newly presented and currently produced products on a higher platform, making the efficient use of resources and brand name image in the market.

Interexchange Communicating Across Functional Boundaries Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
Governmental assistance

Changing criteria of worldwide food.
Enhanced market share. Altering understanding towards much healthier items Improvements in R&D and also QA divisions.

Intro of E-marketing.
No such impact as it is good. Worries over recycling.

Use sources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Highest given that 6000 Greatest after Company with much less growth than Company 1st Most affordable
R&D Spending Highest possible given that 2006 Highest after Company 3rd Most affordable
Net Profit Margin Greatest considering that 2006 with quick growth from 2005 to 2017 As a result of sale of Alcon in 2019. Practically equal to Kraft Foods Incorporation Nearly equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nutrition as well as health variable Highest number of brand names with lasting practices Largest confectionary as well as refined foods brand on the planet Largest milk products and also bottled water brand in the world
Segmentation Center and also upper center level customers worldwide Specific consumers in addition to family team All age and also Revenue Consumer Groups Middle and also upper middle level consumers worldwide
Number of Brands 4th 6th 5th 1st

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 94737 329859 179454 163939 596499
Net Profit Margin 8.41% 3.97% 14.99% 9.54% 65.38%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 35.29 8.11 3.56 4.55 73.61
Total Asset 179955 849275 136561 273398 89499
Total Debt 72819 14311 41966 54342 13542
Debt Ratio 79% 58% 51% 83% 62%
R&D Spending 3585 5953 8536 2545 7143
R&D Spending as % of Sales 1.83% 8.87% 6.47% 2.45% 8.94%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations