Menu

Arcapita 2002 Case Study Solution

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Harvard >> Arcapita 2002 >>

Arcapita 2002 Case Study Solution

Business is currently one of the most significant food chains worldwide. It was established by Henri Arcapita 2002 in 1866, a German Pharmacist who initially released "FarineLactee"; a mix of flour and milk to feed babies and decrease mortality rate.
Business is now a multinational business. Unlike other multinational companies, it has senior executives from different countries and attempts to make choices thinking about the whole world. Arcapita 2002 presently has more than 500 factories worldwide and a network spread throughout 86 nations.

Purpose

The purpose of Business Corporation is to improve the quality of life of people by playing its part and offering healthy food. While making sure that the company is succeeding in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a much better and healthy future

Vision

Arcapita 2002's vision is to offer its clients with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to eat. It wishes to be innovative and simultaneously understand the requirements and requirements of its customers. Its vision is to grow quickly and supply products that would please the requirements of each age group. Arcapita 2002 imagines to establish a trained labor force which would help the business to grow
.

Mission

Arcapita 2002's objective is that as currently, it is the leading company in the food market, it believes in 'Excellent Food, Good Life". Its objective is to supply its consumers with a variety of options that are healthy and best in taste. It is focused on supplying the best food to its consumers throughout the day and night.

Products.

Arcapita 2002 has a broad range of items that it offers to its consumers. In 2011, Business was noted as the most rewarding organization.

Goals and Objectives

• Bearing in mind the vision and objective of the corporation, the company has laid down its goals and objectives. These objectives and objectives are listed below.
• One goal of the company is to reach no garbage dump status. It is pursuing zero waste, where no waste of the factory is landfilled. It motivates its staff members to take the most out of the spin-offs. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another objective of Arcapita 2002 is to squander minimum food throughout production. Frequently, the food produced is wasted even before it reaches the clients.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to improve its packaging in such a way that it would help it to lower the above-mentioned complications and would likewise ensure the shipment of high quality of its items to its customers.
• Meet international standards of the environment.
• Construct a relationship based on trust with its customers, service partners, workers, and federal government.

Critical Issues

Recently, Business Business is focusing more towards the technique of NHW and investing more of its revenues on the R&D innovation. The country is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW method. The target of the business is not attained as the sales were expected to grow higher at the rate of 10% per year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given in Exhibit H.

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The present Business strategy is based on the principle of Nutritious, Health and Health (NHW). This strategy deals with the idea to bringing modification in the consumer choices about food and making the food stuff much healthier worrying about the health issues.
The vision of this strategy is based on the secret technique i.e. 60/40+ which merely means that the products will have a rating of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based on its nutritional worth. The items will be made with extra dietary value in contrast to all other products in market gaining it a plus on its nutritional material.
This method was embraced to bring more delicious plus healthy foods and drinks in market than ever. In competitors with other business, with an intention of maintaining its trust over customers as Business Business has actually gotten more trusted by costumers.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Costs as a portion of sales are declining with increasing real quantity of costs reveals that the sales are increasing at a greater rate than its R&D costs, and enable the company to more spend on R&D.
Net Profit Margin is increasing while R&D as a percentage of sales is declining. This indication also shows a thumbs-up to the R&D spending, mergers and acquisitions.
Debt ratio of the business is increasing due to its spending on mergers, acquisitions and R&D development rather than payment of debts. This increasing debt ratio posture a risk of default of Business to its financiers and could lead a declining share rates. In terms of increasing financial obligation ratio, the company needs to not spend much on R&D and should pay its present debts to reduce the risk for financiers.
The increasing danger of investors with increasing financial obligation ratio and declining share costs can be observed by substantial decline of EPS of Arcapita 2002 stocks.
The sales growth of business is also low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception structure of consumers. This slow growth likewise hinder company to more spend on its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Note: All the above analysis is done on the basis of calculations and Charts given in the Exhibitions D and E.

TWOS Analysis


2 analysis can be utilized to derive various techniques based on the SWOT Analysis provided above. A quick summary of TWOS Analysis is given in Exhibit H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business ought to introduce more ingenious items by big quantity of R&D Spending and mergers and acquisitions. It could increase the market share of Business and increase the profit margins for the company. It might also supply Business a long term competitive advantage over its competitors.
The worldwide expansion of Business must be focused on market capturing of developing nations by expansion, attracting more customers through client's commitment. As establishing nations are more populous than industrialized nations, it might increase the client circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisArcapita 2002 needs to do careful acquisition and merger of companies, as it might affect the consumer's and society's perceptions about Business. It must get and merge with those business which have a market credibility of healthy and nutritious business. It would enhance the understandings of customers about Business.
Business should not only spend its R&D on development, rather than it should likewise concentrate on the R&D spending over assessment of cost of various nutritious items. This would increase cost efficiency of its items, which will result in increasing its sales, due to declining prices, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business should relocate to not just developing but likewise to industrialized nations. It should expands its geographical expansion. This broad geographical growth towards developing and established nations would reduce the threat of potential losses in times of instability in numerous nations. It needs to broaden its circle to different nations like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus countries.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

Arcapita 2002 must carefully manage its acquisitions to prevent the threat of misconception from the consumers about Business. It should get and combine with those nations having a goodwill of being a healthy business in the market. This would not only improve the understanding of consumers about Business but would likewise increase the sales, revenue margins and market share of Business. It would also allow the company to utilize its possible resources effectively on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those companies slowing the NHW strategy growth.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The market division of Business is based upon four aspects; age, gender, earnings and occupation. For example, Business produces a number of products related to children i.e. Cerelac, Nido, etc. and related to grownups i.e. confectionary items. Arcapita 2002 items are quite affordable by nearly all levels, but its significant targeted consumers, in terms of income level are middle and upper middle level clients.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical division of Business is made up of its presence in nearly 86 nations. Its geographical segmentation is based upon 2 primary elements i.e. average income level of the customer as well as the climate of the region. Singapore Business Business's division is done on the basis of the weather condition of the region i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic segmentation of Business is based upon the character and lifestyle of the client. Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those customers whose life design is quite hectic and do not have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Arcapita 2002 behavioral division is based upon the attitude understanding and awareness of the client. For example its extremely nutritious products target those consumers who have a health conscious attitude towards their consumptions.

Arcapita 2002 Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand in the market and keep the customer undamaged with the brand name, there are two alternatives:
Option: 1
The Company must invest more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase total properties of the company, increasing the wealth of the company. However, spending on R&D would be sunk expense.
2. The company can resell the obtained units in the market, if it fails to execute its strategy. Nevertheless, amount invest in the R&D might not be revived, and it will be thought about entirely sunk cost, if it do not offer potential outcomes.
3. Investing in R&D offer slow development in sales, as it takes long time to present a product. Acquisitions offer fast outcomes, as it supply the company already developed item, which can be marketed soon after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of business's which do not fit with the business's values like Kraftz foods can lead the company to face misunderstanding of consumers about Business core worths of healthy and nutritious items.
2 Big costs on acquisitions than R&D would send a signal of company's inefficiency of developing ingenious items, and would outcomes in consumer's dissatisfaction.
3. Big acquisitions than R&D would extend the product line of the business by the items which are already present in the market, making business unable to introduce new innovative items.
Alternative: 2.
The Business must spend more on its R&D rather than acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would allow the business to produce more innovative products.
2. It would offer the company a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would make it possible for the company to increase its targeted consumers by presenting those products which can be provided to a totally brand-new market section.
4. Innovative items will supply long term benefits and high market share in long run.
Cons:
1. It would reduce the profit margins of the company.
2. In case of failure, the entire spending on R&D would be thought about as sunk expense, and would impact the business at big. The threat is not in the case of acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of company, which could provide a negative signal to the financiers, and might result I declining stock prices.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with considerable costs on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would allow the business to present brand-new ingenious items with less threat of converting the costs on R&D into sunk expense.
2. It would provide a favorable signal to the investors, as the total assets of the business would increase with its considerable R&D costs.
3. It would not impact the earnings margins of the business at a big rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would supply the business a strong long term market position in terms of the company's general wealth as well as in regards to ingenious products.
Cons:
1. Threat of conversion of R&D costs into sunk expense, greater than alternative 1 lower than alternative 2.
2. Danger of misunderstanding about the acquisitions, greater than alternative 2 and lesser than alternative 1.
3. Intro of less variety of ingenious products than alternative 2 and high variety of innovative items than alternative 1.

Arcapita 2002 Conclusion

RecommendationsIt has actually institutionalised its strategies and culture to align itself with the market modifications and consumer behavior, which has actually ultimately permitted it to sustain its market share. Business has actually established significant market share and brand name identity in the metropolitan markets, it is recommended that the business needs to focus on the rural areas in terms of establishing brand name commitment, awareness, and equity, such can be done by developing a particular brand name allowance method through trade marketing tactics, that draw clear difference in between Arcapita 2002 products and other competitor products.

Arcapita 2002 Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental assistance

Transforming standards of global food.
Improved market share. Changing assumption towards much healthier products Improvements in R&D and also QA departments.

Intro of E-marketing.
No such effect as it is good. Problems over recycling.

Use of resources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Highest considering that 1000 Highest after Company with less development than Business 3rd Lowest
R&D Spending Highest given that 2005 Highest after Company 1st Cheapest
Net Profit Margin Highest possible given that 2009 with rapid growth from 2001 to 2014 As a result of sale of Alcon in 2014. Virtually equal to Kraft Foods Consolidation Nearly equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nourishment and also health and wellness variable Greatest variety of brands with lasting techniques Largest confectionary as well as refined foods brand name in the world Biggest milk products and bottled water brand in the world
Segmentation Center as well as upper center degree consumers worldwide Private consumers in addition to house team All age and Revenue Customer Teams Center and upper center level consumers worldwide
Number of Brands 5th 1st 8th 6th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 22648 255378 694789 333663 682144
Net Profit Margin 2.65% 7.32% 65.52% 4.56% 51.95%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 18.48 9.29 2.11 3.78 56.71
Total Asset 939397 848416 597296 525172 63313
Total Debt 22129 37861 13876 46327 58791
Debt Ratio 35% 38% 86% 41% 22%
R&D Spending 8292 7447 3898 7261 8782
R&D Spending as % of Sales 6.71% 1.56% 2.22% 7.26% 6.39%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations