Menu

The Hestia Fund Case Study Analysis

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Chicago Booth >> The Hestia Fund >>

The Hestia Fund Case Study Solution

The Hestia Fund is currently among the biggest food chains worldwide. It was established by Chicago Booth in 1866, a German Pharmacist who initially introduced "FarineLactee"; a mix of flour and milk to feed infants and reduce mortality rate. At the exact same time, the Page siblings from Switzerland likewise found The Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company. The two became competitors in the beginning but later combined in 1905, resulting in the birth of The Hestia Fund.
Business is now a transnational company. Unlike other international business, it has senior executives from different nations and attempts to make decisions thinking about the entire world. The Hestia Fund presently has more than 500 factories worldwide and a network spread throughout 86 nations.

Purpose

The purpose of Business Corporation is to boost the quality of life of people by playing its part and offering healthy food. While making sure that the company is prospering in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a much better and healthy future

Vision

The Hestia Fund's vision is to supply its customers with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to eat. It wishes to be innovative and simultaneously comprehend the requirements and requirements of its customers. Its vision is to grow fast and offer items that would satisfy the requirements of each age group. The Hestia Fund envisions to establish a well-trained workforce which would help the company to grow
.

Mission

The Hestia Fund's mission is that as currently, it is the leading business in the food industry, it believes in 'Great Food, Great Life". Its objective is to offer its customers with a variety of options that are healthy and finest in taste. It is concentrated on providing the very best food to its clients throughout the day and night.

Products.

The Hestia Fund has a broad variety of items that it offers to its customers. In 2011, Business was listed as the most gainful organization.

Goals and Objectives

• Remembering the vision and objective of the corporation, the company has actually put down its objectives and goals. These goals and goals are listed below.
• One goal of the business is to reach no garbage dump status. It is pursuing no waste, where no waste of the factory is landfilled. It motivates its staff members to take the most out of the spin-offs. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another goal of The Hestia Fund is to waste minimum food during production. Frequently, the food produced is wasted even before it reaches the customers.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to enhance its product packaging in such a method that it would help it to lower the above-mentioned issues and would also guarantee the shipment of high quality of its products to its customers.
• Meet global standards of the environment.
• Build a relationship based upon trust with its consumers, company partners, staff members, and federal government.

Critical Issues

Just Recently, Business Business is focusing more towards the method of NHW and investing more of its earnings on the R&D technology. The nation is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW method. However, the target of the company is not attained as the sales were anticipated to grow higher at the rate of 10% each year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given in Display H. There is a need to focus more on the sales then the development technology. Otherwise, it may result in the decreased profits rate. (Henderson, 2012).

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The present Business strategy is based upon the concept of Nutritious, Health and Health (NHW). This technique deals with the idea to bringing modification in the client choices about food and making the food things healthier concerning about the health concerns.
The vision of this strategy is based on the secret technique i.e. 60/40+ which merely suggests that the items will have a rating of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based on its nutritional value. The products will be manufactured with additional dietary value in contrast to all other items in market acquiring it a plus on its dietary material.
This technique was adopted to bring more delicious plus nutritious foods and beverages in market than ever. In competitors with other companies, with an intent of retaining its trust over consumers as Business Company has actually acquired more trusted by customers.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Spending as a portion of sales are declining with increasing actual amount of costs reveals that the sales are increasing at a higher rate than its R&D spending, and allow the business to more invest in R&D.
Net Profit Margin is increasing while R&D as a percentage of sales is decreasing. This sign also shows a green light to the R&D spending, mergers and acquisitions.
Financial obligation ratio of the company is increasing due to its costs on mergers, acquisitions and R&D development instead of payment of debts. This increasing debt ratio pose a danger of default of Business to its investors and could lead a decreasing share prices. Therefore, in regards to increasing debt ratio, the company should not invest much on R&D and ought to pay its present debts to reduce the risk for investors.
The increasing danger of financiers with increasing financial obligation ratio and decreasing share rates can be observed by substantial decrease of EPS of The Hestia Fund stocks.
The sales growth of business is also low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception building of consumers. This slow growth likewise hinder business to more spend on its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Keep in mind: All the above analysis is done on the basis of calculations and Charts given in the Exhibits D and E.

TWOS Analysis


TWOS analysis can be utilized to derive numerous methods based on the SWOT Analysis given above. A short summary of TWOS Analysis is given up Display H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business needs to present more ingenious items by big quantity of R&D Costs and mergers and acquisitions. It might increase the marketplace share of Business and increase the profit margins for the company. It might likewise provide Business a long term competitive benefit over its competitors.
The international growth of Business need to be concentrated on market capturing of developing nations by growth, bring in more customers through client's commitment. As developing countries are more populated than developed nations, it could increase the customer circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisThe Hestia Fund ought to do cautious acquisition and merger of organizations, as it could affect the customer's and society's perceptions about Business. It ought to acquire and combine with those business which have a market reputation of healthy and healthy business. It would improve the perceptions of customers about Business.
Business must not only invest its R&D on development, instead of it ought to also concentrate on the R&D spending over assessment of expense of various healthy items. This would increase cost effectiveness of its items, which will result in increasing its sales, due to decreasing rates, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business ought to move to not only establishing but likewise to developed nations. It should broaden its circle to numerous countries like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus countries.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

It should get and combine with those countries having a goodwill of being a healthy company in the market. It would also allow the company to use its possible resources effectively on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those companies slowing the NHW method growth.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The group segmentation of Business is based on four factors; age, gender, earnings and profession. Business produces numerous products related to babies i.e. Cerelac, Nido, etc. and related to grownups i.e. confectionary products. The Hestia Fund products are rather cost effective by practically all levels, however its major targeted consumers, in terms of income level are middle and upper middle level customers.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical division of Business is composed of its existence in practically 86 countries. Its geographical segmentation is based upon 2 main elements i.e. typical earnings level of the customer in addition to the environment of the area. Singapore Business Business's division is done on the basis of the weather of the area i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic segmentation of Business is based upon the personality and life style of the consumer. For example, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those clients whose lifestyle is rather hectic and don't have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

The Hestia Fund behavioral segmentation is based upon the mindset knowledge and awareness of the consumer. For example its highly nutritious items target those clients who have a health mindful attitude towards their intakes.

The Hestia Fund Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand name in the market and keep the consumer intact with the brand name, there are two alternatives:
Option: 1
The Business needs to invest more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase total assets of the company, increasing the wealth of the company. Nevertheless, spending on R&D would be sunk cost.
2. The business can resell the gotten systems in the market, if it fails to implement its method. Nevertheless, amount invest in the R&D might not be revived, and it will be thought about totally sunk expense, if it do not provide possible outcomes.
3. Spending on R&D supply sluggish development in sales, as it takes long time to present an item. Acquisitions supply quick outcomes, as it supply the company currently established product, which can be marketed quickly after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of company's which do not fit with the company's values like Kraftz foods can lead the company to deal with mistaken belief of consumers about Business core worths of healthy and nutritious products.
2 Large costs on acquisitions than R&D would send a signal of business's inadequacy of establishing innovative items, and would results in customer's frustration.
3. Big acquisitions than R&D would extend the product line of the business by the products which are already present in the market, making business unable to introduce brand-new ingenious items.
Alternative: 2.
The Company ought to invest more on its R&D instead of acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would allow the company to produce more ingenious items.
2. It would supply the business a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would allow the business to increase its targeted clients by introducing those products which can be offered to a completely brand-new market section.
4. Innovative items will provide long term benefits and high market share in long run.
Cons:
1. It would reduce the earnings margins of the company.
2. In case of failure, the whole costs on R&D would be thought about as sunk expense, and would impact the company at big. The threat is not when it comes to acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of business, which might provide an unfavorable signal to the investors, and could result I decreasing stock costs.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with considerable spending on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would allow the company to present new ingenious items with less risk of transforming the spending on R&D into sunk cost.
2. It would offer a positive signal to the financiers, as the general assets of the company would increase with its significant R&D spending.
3. It would not impact the revenue margins of the company at a big rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would offer the business a strong long term market position in terms of the company's general wealth along with in regards to ingenious items.
Cons:
1. Threat of conversion of R&D costs into sunk expense, higher than alternative 1 lesser than alternative 2.
2. Threat of misunderstanding about the acquisitions, greater than alternative 2 and lower than option 1.
3. Intro of less number of innovative items than alternative 2 and high number of innovative products than alternative 1.

The Hestia Fund Conclusion

RecommendationsBusiness has actually stayed the leading market gamer for more than a years. It has actually institutionalized its methods and culture to align itself with the marketplace changes and consumer behavior, which has actually ultimately enabled it to sustain its market share. Business has actually developed significant market share and brand identity in the city markets, it is recommended that the company ought to focus on the rural areas in terms of developing brand loyalty, awareness, and equity, such can be done by creating a particular brand name allowance method through trade marketing techniques, that draw clear distinction between The Hestia Fund products and other rival products. Additionally, Business must leverage its brand name image of safe and healthy food in catering the rural markets and also to upscale the offerings in other categories such as nutrition. This will allow the company to develop brand name equity for newly presented and already produced products on a greater platform, making the efficient use of resources and brand image in the market.

The Hestia Fund Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental support

Altering requirements of international food.
Boosted market share.
Transforming understanding in the direction of healthier products
Improvements in R&D and QA divisions.

Intro of E-marketing.
No such effect as it is good.
Problems over recycling.

Use sources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Highest considering that 9000
Greatest after Company with much less growth than Organisation 4th Lowest
R&D Spending Highest since 2002 Highest possible after Business 4th Cheapest
Net Profit Margin Highest because 2009 with fast development from 2004 to 2019 Because of sale of Alcon in 2011. Almost equal to Kraft Foods Incorporation Practically equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nourishment as well as health factor Highest possible number of brand names with sustainable techniques Largest confectionary as well as processed foods brand name in the world Largest dairy products and mineral water brand name worldwide
Segmentation Center as well as upper center degree customers worldwide Individual customers in addition to home team Any age and Income Customer Groups Center as well as upper center degree customers worldwide
Number of Brands 4th 5th 9th 4th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 22812 833692 946326 721958 217943
Net Profit Margin 3.17% 6.42% 54.92% 4.36% 18.56%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 47.57 3.52 3.48 2.55 28.99
Total Asset 499465 459475 364219 123872 72663
Total Debt 51312 95934 11892 81538 22117
Debt Ratio 18% 73% 54% 78% 25%
R&D Spending 2153 5549 5184 9279 1582
R&D Spending as % of Sales 5.34% 5.59% 3.33% 3.97% 5.54%

The Hestia Fund Executive Summary The Hestia Fund Swot Analysis The Hestia Fund Vrio Analysis The Hestia Fund Pestel Analysis
The Hestia Fund Porters Analysis The Hestia Fund Recommendations