Menu

Stanford University Implementing Fasb Statements 116 And 117 Recommendations Case Studies

Case Study Solution And Analysis

Home >> Harvard >> Stanford University Implementing Fasb Statements 116 And 117 >> Recommendations

Stanford University Implementing Fasb Statements 116 And 117 Case Study Analysis

With the deep analysis of the above alternatives, it is advised that the company should select the alternative 3 in order to preserve a competitive position in the long run. As the alternative 3 would enable the company to not only introduce brand-new and innovative items in the market it would likewise lower the high expenses on R&D under alternative 2 and increase the profit margins. It would allow the business to increase its share rates too, as investors are willing to invest more in companies with significant R&D spending and boost in the overall worth of the business.

Action and implementation Strategy

Technique can be implemented successfully by developing specific short term along with long term plans. These strategies might be as follows;

Short Term Plan (0-1 year)

• Under the short term strategy Stanford University Implementing Fasb Statements 116 And 117 need to carry out numerous activities to execute its NHW strategy effectively. These activities are as follows;.
• Get the audit of its brand name portfolio done, to examine the core selling brands, which generate most of its earnings.
• Analyze the existing target audience in addition to the marketplace sector which is not consist of in the business's circle.
• Analyze the present financial data to measure the quantity that needs to be spent on the R&D and acquisitions.
• Analyze the potential investors and their nature, i.e. do they want long term benefits (capital gain), or the desire early earnings (dividend). It would let the company to understand that how much quantity ought to be invested in R&D.

Mid Term Plan (1-5 years)

• Get those organizations in which the company has prospective experience to deal with. Obtain most beneficial companies with a strong dedication to health, to construct the consumer's perceptions in the right instructions.
• Focus more on acquisitions than R&D to develop the base in the customer's mind about Stanford University Implementing Fasb Statements 116 And 117 worths and vision and to avoid possible danger of sunk cost.

Long Term Plan (1-10 years)

• Acquire organizations with health along with taste factor, as the base for the Stanford University Implementing Fasb Statements 116 And 117 as a business producing healthy products has been built under midterm strategy and now the business could move towards taste factor also to comprehend the customers, which focus more on taste rather than health.
• Be more aggressive towards R&D than the acquisitions, as it is the substantial time to construct new products.