Menu

Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture Case Study Help

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Harvard >> Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture >>

Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture Case Study Analysis

Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture is currently one of the biggest food cycle worldwide. It was founded by Harvard in 1866, a German Pharmacist who first introduced "FarineLactee"; a mix of flour and milk to feed babies and reduce mortality rate. At the same time, the Page bros from Switzerland likewise found The Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company. The 2 ended up being competitors initially but later on merged in 1905, leading to the birth of Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture.
Business is now a global business. Unlike other international business, it has senior executives from different countries and attempts to make decisions thinking about the entire world. Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture presently has more than 500 factories worldwide and a network spread throughout 86 nations.

Purpose

The purpose of Business Corporation is to boost the quality of life of individuals by playing its part and providing healthy food. While making sure that the business is prospering in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a better and healthy future

Vision

Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture's vision is to supply its consumers with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to eat. It wants to be innovative and all at once understand the needs and requirements of its clients. Its vision is to grow quickly and offer products that would please the needs of each age. Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture envisions to develop a well-trained labor force which would help the company to grow
.

Mission

Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture's mission is that as presently, it is the leading company in the food industry, it thinks in 'Great Food, Great Life". Its mission is to offer its customers with a range of choices that are healthy and best in taste too. It is focused on offering the best food to its customers throughout the day and night.

Products.

Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture has a wide variety of products that it uses to its clients. In 2011, Business was noted as the most rewarding organization.

Goals and Objectives

• Remembering the vision and objective of the corporation, the company has put down its goals and goals. These goals and objectives are listed below.
• One objective of the company is to reach absolutely no landfill status. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another objective of Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture is to squander minimum food throughout production. Most often, the food produced is wasted even prior to it reaches the clients.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to enhance its packaging in such a method that it would help it to reduce the above-mentioned problems and would also guarantee the delivery of high quality of its products to its consumers.
• Meet global requirements of the environment.
• Build a relationship based upon trust with its consumers, business partners, staff members, and government.

Critical Issues

Recently, Business Business is focusing more towards the strategy of NHW and investing more of its earnings on the R&D innovation. The nation is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW strategy. Nevertheless, the target of the business is not attained as the sales were expected to grow higher at the rate of 10% annually and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given in Exhibition H. There is a requirement to focus more on the sales then the development technology. Otherwise, it might lead to the decreased revenue rate. (Henderson, 2012).

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The existing Business technique is based upon the concept of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This technique handles the idea to bringing change in the client preferences about food and making the food things healthier worrying about the health issues.
The vision of this strategy is based on the secret approach i.e. 60/40+ which simply suggests that the products will have a score of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based on its dietary value. The products will be produced with extra dietary worth in contrast to all other items in market getting it a plus on its nutritional content.
This method was embraced to bring more delicious plus healthy foods and drinks in market than ever. In competition with other business, with an intention of retaining its trust over consumers as Business Company has actually gotten more trusted by customers.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Costs as a portion of sales are decreasing with increasing actual amount of costs reveals that the sales are increasing at a higher rate than its R&D spending, and allow the company to more invest in R&D.
Net Revenue Margin is increasing while R&D as a portion of sales is declining. This indicator likewise reveals a thumbs-up to the R&D spending, mergers and acquisitions.
Financial obligation ratio of the business is increasing due to its costs on mergers, acquisitions and R&D development rather than payment of debts. This increasing financial obligation ratio posture a threat of default of Business to its investors and could lead a declining share costs. In terms of increasing financial obligation ratio, the company should not invest much on R&D and ought to pay its present debts to decrease the danger for financiers.
The increasing threat of financiers with increasing debt ratio and decreasing share rates can be observed by big decline of EPS of Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture stocks.
The sales development of business is also low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow understanding building of consumers. This slow growth also impede business to additional spend on its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Keep in mind: All the above analysis is done on the basis of estimations and Charts given in the Exhibitions D and E.

TWOS Analysis


2 analysis can be used to derive numerous techniques based on the SWOT Analysis provided above. A brief summary of TWOS Analysis is given in Exhibition H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business must introduce more innovative products by large quantity of R&D Costs and mergers and acquisitions. It could increase the market share of Business and increase the earnings margins for the company. It might likewise provide Business a long term competitive benefit over its competitors.
The worldwide growth of Business need to be concentrated on market catching of developing countries by expansion, bring in more clients through customer's loyalty. As establishing nations are more populated than developed countries, it could increase the client circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisRaffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture must do careful acquisition and merger of companies, as it could affect the customer's and society's perceptions about Business. It must obtain and combine with those business which have a market credibility of healthy and nutritious business. It would enhance the perceptions of customers about Business.
Business must not just spend its R&D on innovation, rather than it needs to also focus on the R&D spending over examination of cost of various healthy products. This would increase expense efficiency of its products, which will result in increasing its sales, due to decreasing costs, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business should move to not only developing however also to developed nations. It ought to broaden its circle to various nations like Unilever which runs in about 170 plus nations.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture ought to wisely manage its acquisitions to prevent the risk of misconception from the customers about Business. It ought to acquire and combine with those countries having a goodwill of being a healthy business in the market. This would not only enhance the perception of consumers about Business however would also increase the sales, earnings margins and market share of Business. It would also allow the business to use its prospective resources effectively on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those companies slowing the NHW technique development.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The group segmentation of Business is based upon four factors; age, gender, earnings and profession. For example, Business produces several items connected to children i.e. Cerelac, Nido, etc. and related to grownups i.e. confectionary products. Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture products are rather budget-friendly by practically all levels, but its significant targeted consumers, in regards to earnings level are middle and upper middle level clients.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical division of Business is composed of its existence in almost 86 nations. Its geographical segmentation is based upon two main aspects i.e. typical earnings level of the consumer as well as the climate of the area. Singapore Business Company's segmentation is done on the basis of the weather condition of the area i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic division of Business is based upon the personality and lifestyle of the customer. For instance, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those customers whose life style is rather hectic and do not have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture behavioral division is based upon the mindset understanding and awareness of the customer. Its extremely nutritious products target those customers who have a health conscious mindset towards their intakes.

Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand name in the market and keep the customer intact with the brand name, there are 2 options:
Alternative: 1
The Company should invest more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase total possessions of the business, increasing the wealth of the business. Costs on R&D would be sunk expense.
2. The business can resell the obtained systems in the market, if it fails to implement its strategy. However, amount invest in the R&D could not be restored, and it will be considered completely sunk expense, if it do not offer possible results.
3. Investing in R&D offer slow development in sales, as it takes long time to introduce an item. However, acquisitions supply fast results, as it offer the company already established product, which can be marketed not long after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of business's which do not fit with the company's worths like Kraftz foods can lead the company to face misunderstanding of customers about Business core values of healthy and nutritious items.
2 Big spending on acquisitions than R&D would send a signal of company's ineffectiveness of developing innovative items, and would results in consumer's discontentment also.
3. Large acquisitions than R&D would extend the line of product of the business by the items which are already present in the market, making company not able to present brand-new innovative products.
Option: 2.
The Business must invest more on its R&D rather than acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would allow the business to produce more innovative products.
2. It would provide the business a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would allow the company to increase its targeted clients by introducing those products which can be provided to a totally new market sector.
4. Ingenious items will provide long term advantages and high market share in long term.
Cons:
1. It would decrease the earnings margins of the company.
2. In case of failure, the entire costs on R&D would be thought about as sunk cost, and would affect the company at large. The risk is not in the case of acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of company, which might offer an unfavorable signal to the investors, and might result I declining stock rates.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with significant spending on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would permit the company to introduce new innovative items with less risk of transforming the spending on R&D into sunk expense.
2. It would provide a positive signal to the investors, as the overall properties of the company would increase with its considerable R&D spending.
3. It would not affect the earnings margins of the business at a large rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would supply the business a strong long term market position in regards to the company's general wealth in addition to in terms of innovative items.
Cons:
1. Risk of conversion of R&D spending into sunk cost, greater than option 1 lower than alternative 2.
2. Danger of misunderstanding about the acquisitions, greater than alternative 2 and lesser than alternative 1.
3. Introduction of less number of innovative products than alternative 2 and high number of innovative products than alternative 1.

Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture Conclusion

RecommendationsIt has institutionalized its techniques and culture to align itself with the market changes and client habits, which has eventually permitted it to sustain its market share. Business has actually developed considerable market share and brand identity in the urban markets, it is recommended that the company should focus on the rural locations in terms of developing brand name commitment, awareness, and equity, such can be done by developing a specific brand name allotment technique through trade marketing methods, that draw clear distinction between Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture items and other competitor products.

Raffles Holdings Limited Valuation Of A Divestiture Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental assistance

Altering requirements of global food.
Enhanced market share. Altering perception towards healthier items Improvements in R&D as well as QA divisions.

Intro of E-marketing.
No such influence as it is favourable. Problems over recycling.

Use resources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Highest possible considering that 4000 Highest after Company with less growth than Business 1st Cheapest
R&D Spending Greatest since 2005 Highest possible after Organisation 2nd Most affordable
Net Profit Margin Highest possible considering that 2008 with quick growth from 2009 to 2015 As a result of sale of Alcon in 2012. Nearly equal to Kraft Foods Incorporation Almost equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nutrition as well as wellness factor Highest number of brand names with sustainable methods Biggest confectionary and also refined foods brand worldwide Biggest dairy items and also bottled water brand worldwide
Segmentation Center and also upper center level consumers worldwide Individual customers together with house group Every age and Revenue Customer Teams Middle and upper middle level customers worldwide
Number of Brands 6th 3rd 9th 7th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 53173 824722 111313 453849 147328
Net Profit Margin 5.67% 5.74% 27.54% 6.24% 88.57%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 34.99 5.79 9.96 2.69 87.34
Total Asset 541988 355111 336329 984654 58336
Total Debt 91829 36712 95664 12624 98995
Debt Ratio 99% 68% 79% 98% 41%
R&D Spending 9227 5587 6838 5352 7968
R&D Spending as % of Sales 2.91% 1.72% 8.81% 5.59% 6.91%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations