Menu

Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership Case Study Solution

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Harvard >> Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership >>

Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership Case Study Solution

Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership is presently among the most significant food cycle worldwide. It was founded by Harvard in 1866, a German Pharmacist who first released "FarineLactee"; a mix of flour and milk to feed infants and decrease mortality rate. At the very same time, the Page bros from Switzerland likewise found The Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Business. The 2 became rivals initially however later combined in 1905, resulting in the birth of Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership.
Business is now a global company. Unlike other multinational business, it has senior executives from different nations and tries to make choices considering the entire world. Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership currently has more than 500 factories worldwide and a network spread throughout 86 countries.

Purpose

The purpose of Business Corporation is to enhance the quality of life of people by playing its part and providing healthy food. While making sure that the company is succeeding in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a better and healthy future

Vision

Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership's vision is to offer its clients with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to eat. It wishes to be ingenious and all at once understand the needs and requirements of its customers. Its vision is to grow fast and provide products that would please the requirements of each age. Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership imagines to develop a trained labor force which would help the business to grow
.

Mission

Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership's mission is that as currently, it is the leading business in the food market, it thinks in 'Great Food, Good Life". Its mission is to offer its consumers with a variety of choices that are healthy and best in taste as well. It is focused on providing the very best food to its consumers throughout the day and night.

Products.

Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership has a broad range of items that it provides to its consumers. In 2011, Business was noted as the most gainful organization.

Goals and Objectives

• Keeping in mind the vision and objective of the corporation, the business has actually laid down its objectives and goals. These goals and objectives are noted below.
• One objective of the company is to reach absolutely no landfill status. It is pursuing absolutely no waste, where no waste of the factory is landfilled. It motivates its employees to take the most out of the by-products. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another goal of Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership is to lose minimum food throughout production. Most often, the food produced is wasted even prior to it reaches the clients.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to enhance its product packaging in such a method that it would help it to lower the above-mentioned complications and would likewise ensure the delivery of high quality of its items to its clients.
• Meet worldwide requirements of the environment.
• Develop a relationship based upon trust with its consumers, organisation partners, workers, and federal government.

Critical Issues

Recently, Business Company is focusing more towards the technique of NHW and investing more of its revenues on the R&D technology. The country is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW method. Nevertheless, the target of the company is not achieved as the sales were expected to grow greater at the rate of 10% each year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given in Display H. There is a requirement to focus more on the sales then the development technology. Otherwise, it may lead to the decreased revenue rate. (Henderson, 2012).

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The present Business strategy is based on the concept of Nutritious, Health and Wellness (NHW). This strategy handles the concept to bringing change in the client preferences about food and making the food things healthier concerning about the health problems.
The vision of this method is based on the key method i.e. 60/40+ which just implies that the items will have a score of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based on its nutritional worth. The items will be made with extra dietary value in contrast to all other products in market gaining it a plus on its nutritional material.
This strategy was adopted to bring more delicious plus healthy foods and beverages in market than ever. In competitors with other business, with an objective of maintaining its trust over customers as Business Company has actually gained more relied on by costumers.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Costs as a portion of sales are declining with increasing actual amount of spending reveals that the sales are increasing at a greater rate than its R&D costs, and permit the business to more invest in R&D.
Net Profit Margin is increasing while R&D as a portion of sales is decreasing. This indication likewise reveals a thumbs-up to the R&D spending, mergers and acquisitions.
Financial obligation ratio of the company is increasing due to its spending on mergers, acquisitions and R&D advancement rather than payment of financial obligations. This increasing debt ratio posture a threat of default of Business to its investors and might lead a decreasing share costs. Therefore, in terms of increasing financial obligation ratio, the firm must not invest much on R&D and must pay its current financial obligations to reduce the danger for financiers.
The increasing risk of investors with increasing financial obligation ratio and decreasing share prices can be observed by huge decline of EPS of Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership stocks.
The sales growth of business is likewise low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow perception building of customers. This sluggish development also hinder business to more invest in its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Note: All the above analysis is done on the basis of calculations and Charts given in the Displays D and E.

TWOS Analysis


TWOS analysis can be utilized to derive different strategies based upon the SWOT Analysis provided above. A brief summary of TWOS Analysis is given in Display H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business ought to introduce more ingenious items by large quantity of R&D Costs and mergers and acquisitions. It could increase the market share of Business and increase the profit margins for the company. It might also provide Business a long term competitive advantage over its competitors.
The international expansion of Business ought to be concentrated on market recording of developing nations by growth, drawing in more clients through client's loyalty. As developing countries are more populated than developed countries, it could increase the customer circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisDanone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership ought to do careful acquisition and merger of organizations, as it might impact the consumer's and society's perceptions about Business. It ought to get and merge with those business which have a market credibility of healthy and healthy companies. It would enhance the perceptions of consumers about Business.
Business must not only invest its R&D on development, instead of it ought to also concentrate on the R&D costs over assessment of cost of different healthy products. This would increase expense effectiveness of its products, which will result in increasing its sales, due to declining rates, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business should move to not only establishing but also to developed nations. It should broadens its geographical expansion. This large geographical expansion towards developing and developed countries would lower the threat of potential losses in times of instability in different countries. It needs to broaden its circle to various countries like Unilever which operates in about 170 plus nations.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

It must obtain and combine with those nations having a goodwill of being a healthy company in the market. It would also allow the company to use its potential resources efficiently on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those organizations slowing the NHW strategy growth.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The demographic division of Business is based on 4 aspects; age, gender, income and profession. For instance, Business produces numerous items related to infants i.e. Cerelac, Nido, and so on and associated to grownups i.e. confectionary items. Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership products are quite inexpensive by almost all levels, however its major targeted customers, in terms of income level are middle and upper middle level clients.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical segmentation of Business is made up of its presence in practically 86 nations. Its geographical segmentation is based upon two main elements i.e. typical earnings level of the customer along with the climate of the region. For instance, Singapore Business Business's segmentation is done on the basis of the weather condition of the region i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic division of Business is based upon the personality and life style of the consumer. For instance, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those customers whose life style is rather busy and don't have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership behavioral division is based upon the attitude knowledge and awareness of the consumer. Its highly healthy items target those customers who have a health mindful mindset towards their usages.

Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand name in the market and keep the customer undamaged with the brand name, there are 2 options:
Alternative: 1
The Company ought to spend more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase overall assets of the company, increasing the wealth of the company. Nevertheless, spending on R&D would be sunk cost.
2. The company can resell the obtained units in the market, if it fails to implement its technique. Quantity invest on the R&D could not be restored, and it will be considered totally sunk cost, if it do not offer potential results.
3. Investing in R&D offer sluggish development in sales, as it takes long time to introduce a product. Nevertheless, acquisitions provide fast outcomes, as it offer the company currently established item, which can be marketed not long after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of business's which do not fit with the company's worths like Kraftz foods can lead the business to face mistaken belief of customers about Business core values of healthy and healthy items.
2 Big costs on acquisitions than R&D would send out a signal of business's ineffectiveness of establishing ingenious items, and would results in consumer's discontentment.
3. Large acquisitions than R&D would extend the line of product of the company by the items which are already present in the market, making business not able to introduce brand-new ingenious items.
Alternative: 2.
The Company should spend more on its R&D rather than acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would make it possible for the business to produce more innovative items.
2. It would supply the business a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would allow the business to increase its targeted clients by introducing those items which can be provided to an entirely brand-new market sector.
4. Ingenious items will offer long term benefits and high market share in long run.
Cons:
1. It would decrease the profit margins of the business.
2. In case of failure, the entire spending on R&D would be thought about as sunk cost, and would impact the company at large. The risk is not in the case of acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of company, which could provide an unfavorable signal to the financiers, and might result I declining stock rates.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with significant costs on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would enable the business to present brand-new ingenious items with less threat of converting the spending on R&D into sunk cost.
2. It would supply a positive signal to the investors, as the general possessions of the company would increase with its significant R&D costs.
3. It would not impact the earnings margins of the business at a big rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would supply the business a strong long term market position in terms of the business's general wealth in addition to in terms of innovative products.
Cons:
1. Threat of conversion of R&D costs into sunk expense, higher than option 1 lower than alternative 2.
2. Threat of mistaken belief about the acquisitions, higher than alternative 2 and lower than option 1.
3. Introduction of less number of ingenious products than alternative 2 and high number of innovative products than alternative 1.

Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership Conclusion

RecommendationsBusiness has remained the top market gamer for more than a decade. It has actually institutionalized its techniques and culture to align itself with the market changes and client behavior, which has actually eventually enabled it to sustain its market share. Business has developed substantial market share and brand identity in the urban markets, it is recommended that the business must focus on the rural areas in terms of developing brand name loyalty, awareness, and equity, such can be done by producing a specific brand name allowance technique through trade marketing tactics, that draw clear difference between Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership items and other rival products. Moreover, Business must utilize its brand picture of safe and healthy food in catering the rural markets and also to upscale the offerings in other categories such as nutrition. This will permit the company to establish brand name equity for recently introduced and already produced items on a higher platform, making the efficient usage of resources and brand image in the market.

Danone And Wahaha A Bittersweet Partnership Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental support

Altering requirements of global food.
Boosted market share. Transforming understanding in the direction of healthier items Improvements in R&D and QA departments.

Introduction of E-marketing.
No such influence as it is good. Problems over recycling.

Use of sources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Greatest because 5000 Greatest after Service with much less development than Business 8th Lowest
R&D Spending Highest possible considering that 2007 Greatest after Service 5th Lowest
Net Profit Margin Highest given that 2006 with rapid growth from 2009 to 2013 Because of sale of Alcon in 2018. Virtually equal to Kraft Foods Consolidation Almost equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nutrition as well as health and wellness variable Highest possible number of brand names with lasting techniques Largest confectionary and refined foods brand name on the planet Biggest milk items and also mineral water brand on the planet
Segmentation Middle as well as top center degree customers worldwide Specific clients along with home group Every age and Revenue Client Teams Middle and top center level customers worldwide
Number of Brands 4th 3rd 7th 2nd

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 53533 342592 759258 756675 196144
Net Profit Margin 1.28% 7.14% 16.97% 9.82% 45.14%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 11.91 9.63 6.91 2.28 74.69
Total Asset 347249 882385 385433 411686 19644
Total Debt 93376 86179 78295 83193 14226
Debt Ratio 47% 18% 39% 81% 39%
R&D Spending 4958 1225 1638 9532 3251
R&D Spending as % of Sales 9.16% 1.13% 2.76% 4.98% 7.72%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations