Menu

Owning The Right Risks Case Study Help

Case Study Solution And Analysis


Home >> Chicago Booth >> Owning The Right Risks >>

Owning The Right Risks Case Study Analysis

Business is presently one of the greatest food chains worldwide. It was established by Henri Owning The Right Risks in 1866, a German Pharmacist who initially launched "FarineLactee"; a mix of flour and milk to feed babies and reduce death rate.
Business is now a multinational business. Unlike other international business, it has senior executives from various nations and attempts to make decisions considering the entire world. Owning The Right Risks currently has more than 500 factories around the world and a network spread across 86 nations.

Purpose

The function of Business Corporation is to boost the quality of life of individuals by playing its part and offering healthy food. While making sure that the company is succeeding in the long run, that's how it plays its part for a much better and healthy future

Vision

Owning The Right Risks's vision is to provide its customers with food that is healthy, high in quality and safe to eat. It wants to be ingenious and at the same time comprehend the requirements and requirements of its customers. Its vision is to grow fast and provide products that would satisfy the requirements of each age. Owning The Right Risks visualizes to establish a well-trained workforce which would help the company to grow
.

Mission

Owning The Right Risks's objective is that as currently, it is the leading company in the food industry, it thinks in 'Great Food, Good Life". Its mission is to offer its consumers with a range of choices that are healthy and best in taste also. It is concentrated on providing the very best food to its consumers throughout the day and night.

Products.

Owning The Right Risks has a large range of items that it provides to its clients. In 2011, Business was noted as the most gainful company.

Goals and Objectives

• Keeping in mind the vision and mission of the corporation, the company has put down its goals and goals. These goals and objectives are noted below.
• One objective of the business is to reach zero landfill status. (Business, aboutus, 2017).
• Another goal of Owning The Right Risks is to lose minimum food during production. Frequently, the food produced is lost even prior to it reaches the consumers.
• Another thing that Business is dealing with is to enhance its product packaging in such a way that it would help it to decrease the above-mentioned issues and would also guarantee the delivery of high quality of its items to its consumers.
• Meet international standards of the environment.
• Construct a relationship based on trust with its consumers, business partners, workers, and federal government.

Critical Issues

Just Recently, Business Company is focusing more towards the technique of NHW and investing more of its revenues on the R&D innovation. The nation is investing more on acquisitions and mergers to support its NHW strategy. However, the target of the business is not accomplished as the sales were expected to grow greater at the rate of 10% per year and the operating margins to increase by 20%, given up Display H. There is a requirement to focus more on the sales then the development technology. Otherwise, it might result in the decreased revenue rate. (Henderson, 2012).

Situational Analysis.

Analysis of Current Strategy, Vision and Goals

The present Business method is based on the principle of Nutritious, Health and Health (NHW). This strategy handles the concept to bringing change in the consumer choices about food and making the food things much healthier worrying about the health concerns.
The vision of this technique is based upon the key approach i.e. 60/40+ which simply means that the items will have a rating of 60% on the basis of taste and 40% is based upon its dietary worth. The products will be made with additional nutritional value in contrast to all other products in market acquiring it a plus on its dietary material.
This strategy was adopted to bring more delicious plus healthy foods and drinks in market than ever. In competition with other business, with an intention of maintaining its trust over clients as Business Company has actually gotten more trusted by clients.

Quantitative Analysis.

R&D Costs as a percentage of sales are declining with increasing actual amount of spending reveals that the sales are increasing at a higher rate than its R&D spending, and permit the business to more spend on R&D.
Net Earnings Margin is increasing while R&D as a percentage of sales is declining. This indication also reveals a green light to the R&D spending, mergers and acquisitions.
Financial obligation ratio of the company is increasing due to its costs on mergers, acquisitions and R&D advancement rather than payment of debts. This increasing debt ratio pose a risk of default of Business to its financiers and might lead a decreasing share costs. In terms of increasing financial obligation ratio, the firm should not spend much on R&D and should pay its existing financial obligations to reduce the danger for financiers.
The increasing threat of financiers with increasing financial obligation ratio and declining share prices can be observed by huge decline of EPS of Owning The Right Risks stocks.
The sales development of business is likewise low as compare to its mergers and acquisitions due to slow understanding structure of consumers. This sluggish growth likewise prevent company to more spend on its mergers and acquisitions.( Business, Business Financial Reports, 2006-2010).
Note: All the above analysis is done on the basis of calculations and Graphs given up the Exhibits D and E.

TWOS Analysis


TWOS analysis can be utilized to derive different strategies based upon the SWOT Analysis given above. A brief summary of TWOS Analysis is given in Exhibition H.

Strategies to exploit Opportunities using Strengths

Business must present more innovative items by large quantity of R&D Costs and mergers and acquisitions. It could increase the market share of Business and increase the earnings margins for the business. It might also offer Business a long term competitive benefit over its rivals.
The international growth of Business need to be concentrated on market capturing of developing nations by expansion, attracting more consumers through consumer's commitment. As developing nations are more populous than industrialized countries, it could increase the client circle of Business.

Strategies to Overcome Weaknesses to Exploit Opportunities

Swot AnalysisOwning The Right Risks should do mindful acquisition and merger of companies, as it might impact the consumer's and society's understandings about Business. It must acquire and merge with those companies which have a market reputation of healthy and healthy companies. It would enhance the understandings of consumers about Business.
Business must not only spend its R&D on innovation, instead of it ought to likewise focus on the R&D costs over assessment of expense of various nutritious products. This would increase cost performance of its products, which will lead to increasing its sales, due to decreasing rates, and margins.

Strategies to use strengths to overcome threats

Business must move to not just developing but likewise to developed nations. It should expand its circle to different countries like Unilever which runs in about 170 plus countries.

Strategies to overcome weaknesses to avoid threats

Owning The Right Risks should sensibly manage its acquisitions to avoid the threat of mistaken belief from the consumers about Business. It must obtain and merge with those nations having a goodwill of being a healthy business in the market. This would not only enhance the perception of customers about Business however would likewise increase the sales, revenue margins and market share of Business. It would likewise allow the company to use its potential resources efficiently on its other operations rather than acquisitions of those organizations slowing the NHW method growth.

Segmentation Analysis

Demographic Segmentation

The market segmentation of Business is based upon four factors; age, gender, income and occupation. For instance, Business produces a number of items related to babies i.e. Cerelac, Nido, etc. and associated to adults i.e. confectionary products. Owning The Right Risks products are rather inexpensive by practically all levels, but its major targeted consumers, in terms of income level are middle and upper middle level customers.

Geographical Segmentation

Geographical segmentation of Business is composed of its existence in practically 86 countries. Its geographical division is based upon 2 main elements i.e. average income level of the customer along with the climate of the region. Singapore Business Company's segmentation is done on the basis of the weather condition of the region i.e. hot, warm or cold.

Psychographic Segmentation

Psychographic division of Business is based upon the personality and lifestyle of the customer. For example, Business 3 in 1 Coffee target those consumers whose life style is quite busy and don't have much time.

Behavioral Segmentation

Owning The Right Risks behavioral segmentation is based upon the attitude understanding and awareness of the customer. For example its extremely healthy items target those customers who have a health mindful attitude towards their intakes.

Owning The Right Risks Alternatives

In order to sustain the brand in the market and keep the client undamaged with the brand, there are two options:
Option: 1
The Business should spend more on acquisitions than on the R&D.
Pros:
1. Acquisitions would increase overall possessions of the company, increasing the wealth of the business. Nevertheless, costs on R&D would be sunk expense.
2. The company can resell the gotten units in the market, if it stops working to implement its technique. However, amount spend on the R&D could not be restored, and it will be considered entirely sunk cost, if it do not give prospective results.
3. Spending on R&D provide slow growth in sales, as it takes very long time to introduce an item. Nevertheless, acquisitions provide quick outcomes, as it supply the business already established product, which can be marketed soon after the acquisition.
Cons:
1. Acquisition of business's which do not fit with the company's values like Kraftz foods can lead the business to face misunderstanding of customers about Business core worths of healthy and healthy products.
2 Big costs on acquisitions than R&D would send out a signal of company's inadequacy of developing ingenious items, and would outcomes in consumer's discontentment.
3. Large acquisitions than R&D would extend the product line of the company by the items which are currently present in the market, making business not able to introduce brand-new innovative products.
Option: 2.
The Business ought to spend more on its R&D instead of acquisitions.
Pros:
1. It would make it possible for the company to produce more ingenious items.
2. It would provide the business a strong competitive position in the market.
3. It would allow the business to increase its targeted clients by presenting those products which can be used to a totally brand-new market segment.
4. Innovative items will provide long term benefits and high market share in long term.
Cons:
1. It would decrease the earnings margins of the company.
2. In case of failure, the entire costs on R&D would be considered as sunk expense, and would affect the business at big. The risk is not when it comes to acquisitions.
3. It would not increase the wealth of business, which could provide an unfavorable signal to the financiers, and might result I decreasing stock costs.
Alternative 3:
Continue its acquisitions and mergers with significant spending on in R&D Program.
Vrio AnalysisPros:
1. It would allow the company to introduce new ingenious products with less threat of converting the costs on R&D into sunk expense.
2. It would offer a positive signal to the investors, as the general assets of the company would increase with its substantial R&D costs.
3. It would not impact the revenue margins of the company at a large rate as compare to alternative 2.
4. It would offer the business a strong long term market position in terms of the business's total wealth along with in terms of ingenious products.
Cons:
1. Danger of conversion of R&D spending into sunk expense, greater than alternative 1 lower than alternative 2.
2. Risk of misunderstanding about the acquisitions, higher than alternative 2 and lower than option 1.
3. Introduction of less variety of ingenious items than alternative 2 and high number of ingenious items than alternative 1.

Owning The Right Risks Conclusion

RecommendationsBusiness has actually remained the top market player for more than a years. It has actually institutionalized its strategies and culture to align itself with the market modifications and client habits, which has ultimately enabled it to sustain its market share. Business has actually established considerable market share and brand identity in the city markets, it is advised that the company should focus on the rural areas in terms of developing brand name loyalty, awareness, and equity, such can be done by creating a particular brand name allocation method through trade marketing strategies, that draw clear distinction between Owning The Right Risks items and other competitor items. Furthermore, Business should utilize its brand name picture of safe and healthy food in catering the rural markets and also to upscale the offerings in other categories such as nutrition. This will enable the company to establish brand name equity for freshly introduced and already produced items on a greater platform, making the effective use of resources and brand image in the market.

Owning The Right Risks Exhibits

PESTEL Analysis
P
Political
E
Economic
S
Social
T
Technology
L
Legal
E
Environment
Governmental support

Changing criteria of worldwide food.
Enhanced market share. Changing understanding towards healthier items Improvements in R&D as well as QA divisions.

Intro of E-marketing.
No such effect as it is favourable. Worries over recycling.

Use resources.

Competitor Analysis
Business Unilever PLC Kraft Foods Incorporation DANONE
Sales Growth Highest since 2000 Highest possible after Organisation with less growth than Company 9th Least expensive
R&D Spending Highest possible given that 2006 Greatest after Company 5th Least expensive
Net Profit Margin Greatest because 2008 with fast development from 2001 to 2015 Due to sale of Alcon in 2015. Almost equal to Kraft Foods Unification Almost equal to Unilever N/A
Competitive Advantage Food with Nutrition and wellness element Highest number of brands with sustainable practices Biggest confectionary and also processed foods brand name on the planet Largest milk products and bottled water brand name in the world
Segmentation Center as well as upper center level customers worldwide Private clients along with home group Any age as well as Income Client Groups Center and also top middle level consumers worldwide
Number of Brands 8th 7th 7th 4th

Quantitative Analysis​
Analysis of Financial Statements (In Millions of CHF)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales Revenue 34384 442749 888572 569997 116432
Net Profit Margin 5.33% 3.55% 55.44% 5.42% 98.54%
EPS (Earning Per Share) 64.25 1.42 1.84 9.61 73.62
Total Asset 174354 855865 661192 754564 88942
Total Debt 51735 89369 57662 27487 55669
Debt Ratio 38% 77% 44% 56% 28%
R&D Spending 4747 5787 8183 4722 5625
R&D Spending as % of Sales 7.94% 5.86% 8.66% 2.96% 5.89%

Executive Summary Swot Analysis Vrio Analysis Pestel Analysis
Porters Analysis Recommendations